(Here is the list of all web pages from this
server, arranged by language (in 8 languages).
Choose the page that interests you by
dragging scroll bars, then click on this
page to run it:)
(The same list can be displayed from
"Menu 1" by clicking on
"Menu 2".)
Oto wykaz wszystkich moich stron
ze wszystkich serwerów. Strony te najpierw zestawione są językami
(tj. jako strony po polsku,
angielsku, niemiecku,
francusku, hiszpańsku,
włosku, grecku, oraz
rosyjsku.) Dla każdego zaś języka strony zestawione
są przedmiotowo.
Wybierz interesującą Cię stronę manipulując suwakami, potem kliknij
na nią aby ją uruchomić:
(Ten sam wykaz daje się też wyświetlić
z "Menu 1" poprzez kliknięcie na
"Menu 4".)
The formal scientific proof which
documented that UFO space vehicles
in fact do exist was published In
1982. Already over a quarter of
century has passed (i.e. over 25
years) since the date of publishing
this proof. But about the existence
of it hardly anyone knows. Still the
actual existence of UFOs is denied
by the majority of scientists. Also still
the official human science remains
unaware that by ignoring investigations
on UFOs it deprives itself the
opportunity to develop the competence
in researching intelligences other than
human. This web page is to remind
us, that such a "formal scientific proof
for the existence of UFOs" in fact was
developed, it still remains in power,
and that we are obliged to consider it
in our thinking and actions. The web
page is also to illustrate the evidence
and to explain the method utilised for
proving that UFOs do exist. Furthermore,
this web page is to realise that the
research on intelligences other than
human is for the Earth's science the
basic requirement for growing out of
the present juvenile status.
Part #A:
Introductory information of this web page:
#A1.
What are goals of this web page:
Motto:
"Independently what people say or do, truth always remains true."
The main goal of this web page and the
illustrations included into it, is to present
the formal scientific proof for the existence
of UFOs, and also to present various
issues originate are connected with this proof.
#A2.
The history of the formal scientific proof for the "existence of UFO vehicles":
In 1980 I had the honour to invent and
to develop in details the space vehicle
with a magnetic propulsion system, called the
Magnocraft.
(The design, operation, attributes, specifications,
and capabilities of the Magnocraft are described
in details in volume 3 of the scientific monograph
[1/4] - "Advanced Magnetic Propulsion Systems".
This space vehicle is also described quite well
on several different web pages, e.g. on pages
magnocraft.htm,
oscillatory_chamber.htm, or
propulsion.htm.)
I developed the Magnocraft solely on the basis
of my professional interests in propulsion systems,
i.e. without any influence or inspiration from
extraterrestrial UFOs. At the beginning of my
developmental work I accepted, that the Magnocraft
is just going to be a flying successor for an electric
motor. This is what suggested to me the analogies
and symmetries expressed in the so-called Cyclic
Table. (This Cyclic Table is like a kind of the
Periodic Table of the Elements. only that instead
of chemical elements it is developed for propulsion
systems. Thus on the basis of propulsion systems
that are already invented, it allows to discover further
propulsion systems which still await their inventors.
This Table shown and described, amongst other,
on the totaliztic web page
propulsion.htm.)
In this initial stage of the development of the Magnocraft,
I was completely unaware of the similarities that exist
between Magnocraft and UFOs. This similarity become
obvious only when the complete design and attributes
of the Magnocraft become deduced. Actually this similarities
were pointed out to me only by readers of my articles,
who claimed that they have actually seen the Magnocraft
in operation with their own eyes - only they called it differently,
i.e. "UFOs". Although at that stage I did not envisage any
connection of my Magnocraft and UFOs, just in case there
was one, I followed these claims of my readers and tried
to identify the differences or similarities existing between
both these vehicles. Soon afterwards, with the weight of
the evidence that I collected, I realized that in fact there
are unknown vehicles popularly called "UFOs" already
operational on Earth, which display all the attributes that
have been theoretically predicted for the Magnocraft.
Subsequently the formal proof that "UFOs are already
operational Magnocraft" has been worked out and published.
The first version of this proof appeared in the article [1P]
"Konstrukcja prosto z nieba" ("The design straight from
heaven above") published in the Polish Journal "Przeglad
Techniczny Innowacje", no 12/1981, pp.43-5. Unfortunately,
in this first presentation of the discussed proof,
the editor of the "Przeglad Techniczny Innowacje" would not
publish drawings and photographs that were included to this
article (similar to drawings and photographs that illustrate
this web page). Someone clearly decided that the reinforcement
of that publication with photographic evidence would be
too convincing, and thus would destabilise the existing
"status quo". Supposedly because of the lack of space,
these photographs and drawings could not be also
presented when the publication [1P] was then discussed
in the article [2P] "Jak dowiedziono istnienia UFO"
(i.e. "How the existence of UFOs was proven"), published
in the Polish magazine "Kurier Polski", no 119/1981, page 5.
Thus the complete version of this proof (together with
a complete photographic and descriptive evidence)
could be published only in New Zealand when I decided
to publish it with my private funds - amongst others in monograph
[1e]
and in several other monographs that proceeded [1e].
(see the list of these monographs provided in subsection C10).
The proof presented on this web page is only an updated
extension, with additional evidence, of this original proof
published in New Zealand in monograph [1e].
Currently the complete version of the proof for
the existence of UFOs, presented here, can be
found in volume 13 of monograph
[1/4].
(Even more improved and extended version of it
is planned to be published in volume 13 of monograph
[1/5].)
In the internet this summarised version of the proof
I decided to publish only on 7 May 2008 - when I
designed the first formulation of this web page.
(I decided to prepare this web page in order to
honour over 100,000 victims of the secretive
attack of UFOnauts on Burma - about this attack
I wrote more on a separate web page
katrina.htm - about hurricanes formed technically by UFO vehicles.)
Part #B:
The characteristic of the formal method of proving with the use of which it was proven scientifically that UFO vehicles do exists objectively:
#B1.
Present official human science does NOT acquired yet the competence to research intelligences other than human ones - means research intelligences which do NOT cooperate with scientists who research them:
Motto:
'Only the true hiliness is not afraid of criticism.
Incompetent "authority" always denies everything that could disclose its own ignorance.'
Someone may ask the question, "what is
with this our science that the only thing it seems
to be able to do about UFOs is to deny the
existence of these alien spacecraft, while
the life around us is full of
evidence
for the actual existence of these UFOs".
The reply is simple - the human science
is NOT able, as yet, to investigate anything
that is intelligent, but that do NOT
cooperate with scientists who research it.
The science, of course, has research methods
for investigating the so-called "inanimate nature".
But these methods are based on a blind submission
of objects of research, on the passive cooperation
of these objects with scientists who research them,
on the repetitiveness and predictiveness of behaviours
of whatever is being researched, on susceptibility to
tests, on the same behaviour in actual life and
during experiments, etc., etc. On the other hand,
intelligences other than human do NOT display
any of these characteristics. For example UFOnauts
in fact NOT only that refuse to cooperate with
scientists who research them, but actually hide
thoroughly from the entire humanity the existence
of themselves and activities they carry out on the Earth.
Furthermore, in the disposal of these other intelligences
are technologies, devices, products, and phenomena,
which our official science still does NOT understand
and is NOT even able to guess their existence.
Some amongst these other intelligences have
also the ability to
infiltrate the human science from inside,
similarly like human spies and agents do this
in matters of military intelligence or in order to
carry out clever crimes. In turn after this infiltration
is accomplished - they sabotage the human science
from the inside. With all these problems the official
human science is unable to coupe, is totally
hopeless and incompetent towards them, and thus
the only thing that is able to do, is to deny the
existence of such intelligences other than human
(most probably this denial is what such intelligences
are actually after).
The "official human science" can be classified
to the category of so-called "intellects" (what are
these "intellects", it is defined by the philosophy of
totalizm).
In turn every "intellect" matures due to passing through
a whole range of phases in its development. The
human science also passes through such phases.
So if we compare the development of human science
to the development of a human being, then the
science already has passed through the phase "childhood".
Presently it is in the phase "growing up", means showing
up its "tempers" and behaving like a "arrogant teenager"
who thinks that already knows everything. But the science
is still very far from the maturity of an adult age.
One amongst challenges that this science must
undertake and be able to meet it in order to enter
doors to the adulthood, is just to learn how to research
intelligences other than human ones. Means how to
research these intelligences which in fact do exist,
but which refuse to cooperate with scientists who research
them. About the bitter truth that the official human
science is still incompetent in researching everything
other than people that also have its own intelligence,
certifies a number of facts. So let us have a closer
look at most well known amongst such facts,
explaining why these prove the incompetence
and inability of the Earthly science to research
intelligences other than human.
1. The authoritative denying by the human science that
UFOs do exist and that UFOnauts are active on the Earth.
The official human science persuades people that
UFOs do NOT exist. But it is enough to have a look
at newspapers or at Internet in order to realise how
huge amount of highly consistent evidence continually
comes out to the light and documents the actual
existence of UFOs - for examples of such evidence
see the web page
evidence.htm - about evidence of the existence of UFOs and activities of UFOnauts on the Earth,
aliens.htm - about scientific interpretation of photographs of UFOnauts, or
explain.htm - about scientific interpretation of UFO photographs.
Thus, this official denying of the existence of UFOs by
the human science is just only a kind of "smoke screen"
which is to hide the incompetence of our scientists in
researching intelligences the level of which exceeds
the level of intelligence in an average Earthly scientist.
2. The denying of the existence of
God,
while a wealth of scientific evidence is available,
which conclusively confirms that God in fact does exist.
In reality the human science continually stumble
on the scientifically undeniable evidence for
the existence of God. An entire wealth of such
scientific evidence for the existence of God
is presented in items #A2, #F1, #F2, and
#F3 of the web page
bible.htm - about authorisation of the Bible by God Herself.
On the other hand, God is interested in allowing
the human science to research Her. God even
authorised for this purpose a kind of Her own
"autobiography" called the "Bible". As it is explained
on the web page
will.htm - about the impact of "free will" at fate of the entire human civilisation,
God actually is cooperating with human scientists
who undertake research on Her. But in spite of this,
the human science still feels too incompetent to
undertake any research on God. In turn if the
human science is incompetent in research of
God who cooperates with humans, how much
incompetent it must be in research on
evil UFOnauts,
who NOT only that refuse to cooperate with us,
but also they sabotage the human science from
the inside.
3. The denying by the human science that dolphins
and whales have, and use, an advanced form of language.
A scientifically controversial topic is the actual existence
of the language with the use of which dolphins and
whales communicate with each other. The human
science denies that such a language does exist.
But the existence of such a language is definitively
confirmed for example by a case described
more comprehensively in item #C2 (see 15 in there)
of the web page
evolution.htm - about origins of people, means where to look for a "missing link",
which initially was published in the article "How Moko
the friendly dolphin saved whales", from page A3
of the New Zealand newspaper
"The Dominion Post",
issue dated on Thursday, March 13, 2008. So if
the human science is still incompetent in recognising
the existence of a language in dolphins and whales,
whom do NOT hide from people at all and whom even
enthusiastically cooperate with human researchers,
how this science has the courage to authoritatively
claim anything regarding UFOnauts - who are known
to be very hostile towards people.
4. The stubborn denying of the existence of a colossal
carnivorous "squid" (called the "arkatutos") of around
14-meters long and weighting around 750 kg, in spite
that about this squid informed us for centuries legends
of New Zealand Maoris. For me personally such
many years long denial by the official human science,
that this colossal carnivorous squid in fact does exist,
is the most convincing illustration for the incompetence
of the science in researching intelligences other than
human ones. After all, about the actual existence and
aggressiveness of this colossal squid in waters of New
Zealand, legends of local Maoris informed us for several
centuries. Yet until 1999, when one such squid was
accidentally caught in fishing nets, the official human science
authoritatively denied that such a squid does exist at all.
(Descriptions of this colossal squid are provided in item
#C3 and in caption under "Fig. #I4" on the web page
newzealand.htm - about mysteries and curiosities of New Zealand.)
Surely, it is a habit of this carnivorous animal (which
has some amount of animal intelligence) that it does
NOT cooperate with scientists. Thus, if our official science
was so hopeless and incompetent towards the animal
intelligence of this "squid", that the science was unable
to accept the existence of it, and to research this relatively
primitive animal practically until the end of 20th century,
how hopeless and incompetent this science must be towards
the advanced intelligence and cunning behaviours
of clever aliens who are hostile towards people but
who still keep robbing our planet while hiding from
us in their enormously advanced UFO vehicles.
In order to accept the challenge that is thrown at
the official human science by intelligences other
than the human one, and show in this way the tendency
to "grow up" to its maturity, the science must
develop methods of researching these other
intelligences that refuse to cooperate with scientists
who try to research them. Such methods already
do exist on the Earth, only that are used by human
institutions that are other from the official science.
For example, these methods are used in criminal
investigations, in courts, in military intelligence,
and also by hunters who hunt intelligent animals.
The formal scientific proof for the existence of UFOs
described on this web page was completed with the
use of just such a method. It is called the "method
of matching the attributes".
#B2.
The "method of matching the attributes" that is used for the formal proving that "UFOs are already operational Magnocraft":
Motto:
"In the present situation, when we know perfectly well the design,
operation, and specifications of the Earthly spaceship named the
Magnocraft,
the formal proving of the existence of UFO vehicles
boils down to the proving that UFO manifestations in every aspect
are identical to outcomes of the operation of this Magnocraft."
The logical design of the proof presented
here, is based on a proven in action and
very reliable scientific methodology. It was
also published in a range of articles and
scientific monographs. As no one is
able to disprove it, therefore the proof keeps
its relevance and theoretically speaking
every person on Earth is obliged to respect
its existence and validity. In turn these
people who ignore it, and refuse to acknowledge
its consequences, are acting against the
interests of humanity, behave like mannequins
in hands of cosmic robbers from UFOs,
and also with their actions they document
that they allowed their minds to be completely
manipulated by UFOnauts who secretly
occupy the Earth. This item is to familiarise
readers with details of this proof, and to make
available to them the resource literature in
case they wish to include this proof into their
system of information, knowledge, philosophical
principles, and manners of thinking.
The formal proof discussed here is based on
a very old and countless times proven in action
methodology adopted by humanity a long time
ago and called the "methodology of matching
the attributes". In this methodology two sets of
independent attributes, which describe two different
objects, are compared (matched) with each other,
in order to prove that both these objects are
identical. An oldest example of the use of this
methodology would be an ancient hunter, who
matches the attributes of a trail with attributes
of an animal known to him, in order to determine
as to whether this animal made the trail. This
methodology is one of the most reliable, successful,
and frequently used ways of identifying unknown
objects. It is used in the majority of identification
procedures, including criminal investigations
(matching the evidence present in a site of crime
with a suspect), medicine (matching symptoms
with a disease), military reconnaissances, etc.
In order to prove the existence of UFOs with this
methodology, the proving process begins with
scientific proving that "UFOs are vehicles identical
to the well known to us
Magnocrafts".
Then, after it is scientifically proven that the UFOs
and the Magnocrafts are identical vehicles, various
further conclusions can be drawn. For example,
because the Magnocraft are interstellar vehicles
with a magnetic propulsion system which can be
build physically and the objective existence of which
is beyond any doubt, UFOs also must exist objectively
and must be interstellar vehicles. In order to scientifically
prove the identicity of UFOs and Magnocrafts, a total
match between the theoretically deduced attributes
of the Magnocrafts and the observed attributes of
UFOs must be documented. Therefore, the proof
discussed here is formulated as a logical structure
comprising the following 5 steps:
1. Proposing the working thesis that "UFOs are
already operational Magnocraft" and defining
a way of proving the truth of this thesis. (This
introductory item #B2 achieves this).
2. Identifying the Magnocrafts' attributes, to be
subjected to "matching". Through applying
the "Theory of the Magnocraft" outlined on a
separate web page
magnocraft.htm - descriptions of the "Theory of the Magnocraft",
and also described comprehensively in chapter F from volume 3 of
monograph [1/4] - "Advanced magnetic devices",
12 classes of the most representative attributes
that characterize the operational Magnocrafts
were theoretically identified and are used for the
construction of the proof discussed here. All these
12 (and many further) classes of Magnocrafts'
attributes are listed and explained in subsequent
items of part #C of this web page. The reason
why, in the proof presented here, only 12 attributes
are used (instead of, for example, 13 or 24) is
that from the probability point of view 12 attributes
fully suffice for this purpose (see the justification
provided in subsection P1 of monograph [1/4]).
But the complexity of the Magnocrafts enables
us to identify and describe a large number of
further attributes not considered here (but partially
discussed in subsection P2.13 from monograph
[1/4]). Thus almost any required number of attributes
of the Magnocraft may be included to this formal
proof at a later date, if for some reasons this turns
to be necessary or advisable.
3. Documenting the existence in UFOs of the
corresponding 12 classes of attributes, out of
which each one coincides exactly with the matching
class of attributes deduced for the Magnocrafts.
These corresponding 12 classes of attributes
assigned to UFOs were revealed and documented
due to analyzes of various UFO photographs,
analyses of visual observations of these flying
starship, and due to research on material
evidence of UFO activities that are present
on our planet. The full documentation of the
existence in UFOs of these 12 classes of
attributes observed empirically is presented
in subsections from P2.1 to P2.12 in volume
13 of monograph [1/4]. In turn the presentation
of just photographic evidence for these attributes
is provided in part #C of this web page.
4. Matching each attribute of the Magnocrafts
deduced theoretically, with the corresponding
attribute observed empirically on UFOs.
Because, as this is to be proven in the course
of logical deductions from this web page, such
matching provides a total correspondence (identity)
of both groups of attributes, its conclusive outcome
proves automatically the truth of the working thesis,
thus constituting formal proof that "UFOs are already
operational Magnocrafts". Practically this matching
is carried out each time a given class of evidence
is presented, means in subsections from P2.1 to
P2.12 of monograph [1/4], and also in part #C of
this web page.
5. Drawing the final conclusion from this process of
proving, and explaining consequences of the proof
discussed here. These conclusions are presented
in subsection P2.15 of monograph [1/4], and also in
item #C13 of this web page.
#B3.
In the brief version of the proof provided in
part #C below, shown are mainly highly objective
photographs which document outcomes of
comparisons of UFOs and the
Magnocrafts:
The effort to keep the volume of this web
page at reasonable level, caused that in the
brief version of the proof discussed here for
the existence of UFOs (provided in part #C
below), the process of proving is mainly
documented with the use of objective photographs
(i.e. with the use of authentic photographs of
UFOs, and also my own drawings that illustrate
the operation of the
Magnocraft).
In order to save on the volume, I did NOT
provide below such further kinds of evidence
as: descriptions of eye sightings of UFOs,
reports of people abducted on decks of UFOs,
marks and material remains left by UFOs
on the surface of the Earth, meetings with
UFOnauts, etc., etc. (But these further
categories of evidence are presented in
the full version of the proof, provided in
subsection P2 from volume 13 of monograph
[1/4],
and also on separate web pages of totalizm, e.g. on
evidence.htm - about evidence of UFO activities on the Earth,
explain.htm - about scientific interpretation of UFO photographs,
military_magnocraft.htm - about military and destructive capabilities of UFO vehicles, or
aliens.htm - about scientific interpretation of photographs of UFOnauts.)
So if the reader wishes to learn also this
further (also very wide) evidence, he or she
should look at the full presentation of this
proof provided in subsection P2 from volume 13 of
monograph [1/4] - "Advanced magnetic devices".
Part #C:
Presentation of the photographic evidence with the use of which it is formally proven that UFO vehicles in fact do exists objectively:
#C1.
The correspondence of shapes of individual UFOs to solo flying Magnocraft:
UFO vehicles never pose for photographs. Obtaining a clear photograph of these extraterrestrial vehicles always has an accidental character, that bases on a surprise and on a bit of someone's luck. This means that the biggest challenge of the proof carried out here, is to overcome the extreme difficulties and to obtain legible photographs of UFO vehicles. The situation is even worsen by the fact that there is a whole range of factors at work, which distort the objective picture of UFO vehicles (these distorting factors are discussed in subsection P2.1.1). However, in spite of all this, throughout the years a number of legible photos of UFOs have gradually been accumulated. If someone knowing the Magnocraft reviews these photographs, then it becomes immediately evident, that the shapes of discoidal UFOs correspond to the shape of the Magnocraft in every detail. Thus this correspondence of shapes of both vehicles is the first attribute that we are going to compare in the formal proof presented here.
The identicity of shapes of UFO vehicles and
shapes of the Magnocraft can be noticed during
comparing all authentic photographs of UFOs
that are presented on a whole array of totaliztic
web pages - e.g. see the web pages
explain.htm,
evidence.htm, or
day26.htm,
with drawings of the Magnocraft that are presented
on web pages
magnocraft.htm,
oscillatory_chamber.htm, or
propulsion.htm.
Below, for the photographic documenting this identicity
I am providing one UFO photograph and one drawing
of the Magnocraft. Here these are:
Fig. #C1ab:
The comparison of shape of a discoidal UFO type K3
with discoidal Magnocraft type K3 of the first generation.
In order to facilitate this comparison, the Magnocraft
shown on the web page
magnocraft.htm
is here slanted to obtain approximately the same
orientation as the UFO vehicle has.
(Click on a given photo or drawing to see it enlarged.)
Fig. #C1a (left):
A starship type K3 popularly known as a UFO vehicle.
The UFO photograph shown here was selected from
a sequence of four colour pictures taken by Augusto
Arranda near Yungay, Peru, in March 1967 - see the
book [1Fig.P1] and [2P2] by Ronald D. Story (editor):
"The Encyclopedia of UFOs", New English Library,
London 1980, ISBN 0-450-04118-2, page 39.
The entire sequence of Arranda photographs presents
two UFOs type K3 captured in the various stages of their
decoupling and flying in opposite directions (before these
photographs were taken both vehicles flown coupled into
a spherical flying complex shown e.g. in "Fig. #C2c").
Both vehicles fly in the throbbing mode of operation,
thus their hulk and shape are clearly visible. The
geometrical analysis shows the striking similarities
of these K3 type UFOs to the Magnocraft type K3 -
see the right part of this Figure. The outline of this
UFO reminds us of an inverted saucer, the base
of which is positioned perpendicular to the Earth's
magnetic field force lines. In the centre of this vehicle
the topside convex is clearly distinguishable (in the
Magnocraft this central part it houses the crew cabin
and the central propulsion compartment where the
main propulsor is located). The UFO also possesses
a lens shaped flange that fastens around the vehicle's
base. In the Magnocraft type K3 this flange houses n=8
side propulsors.
Fig. #C1b (right):
The appearance of the smallest Magnocraft type K3
illustrated in the same position as the UFO from "Fig. C1a (left)".
Please notice that the above illustration is also discussed
on "Fig. #11ab" and "Fig. #12" from the totaliztic web page
tapanui.htm
and also on "Fig. #9ab" of the web page
propulsion.htm,
where the reader can learn further details about both
vehicles illustrated here.
* * *
Notice that you can see the enlargement
of each illustration from this web site. For this, it suffices to click
on this illustration. Furthermore, most of the internet browsers that you may
use, including the popular "Internet Explorer",
allow also to download each illustration
to your own computer, where it can be looked at, reduced or enlarged to the
size that you may want, or printed with your own graphical software.
If you wish to shift
a given Figure (i.e. a photograph or a drawing),
i.e. to move it into another part of the screen
where you are just reading a description of it,
you need to do as follows: (1) click on it to make it appear
in another window, (2) the "downsize" this another
window (with a given photograph or drawing) through
"grabbing" its right-bottom corner with your mouse
and then dragging this corner upwards-left to receive
the size of this different window that you wish to have
(notice that since you downsize a fist such a Figure,
all next clicked on will appear already downsized -
unless you enlarge them in the same way),
and then (3) drag this another window with the picture
you wish to relocate to the area of this web page where
you wish to look at it (to move it you just grab it with
your mouse by the blue stripe on the top of it).
Notice also that if you scroll (with scroll bars) the
text of the page when you read it, this another window
(with the drawing) will disappear. In order to return it
into the new position, you need to click on its "icon"
(name bar) on the lowest part of the screen.
#C2.
The identity of observable arrangements of coupled UFOs and Magnocraft:
It is confirmed on a huge body of evidence
that UFOs are also able to create all the
arrangements, which were theoretically
deduced for the Magnocrafts and described
in subsection F3 from volume 3 of monograph
[1/4], while illustrated in "Fig. #5abcdef" from
the web page
propulsion.htm.
The most frequently observed arrangement
of UFOs is the spherical flying complex - shown
below in "Fig. #C2". In numerous photographs
of such complexes not only both vehicles are
visible, but also the double flange which fastens
the complex around its central (horizontal)
plane of symmetry can be distinguished - for
the appearance of this flange see also "Fig. #C1abc"
and "Fig. #K1abc" from the totaliztic web page
evidence.htm
(i.e. Figure P26 from monograph [1/4]).
Fig. #C2abc: The comparison of
spherical flying complex coupled together
from two UFOs type K6 and photographed
over Sweden by Lars Thorn on 6 May 1971,
with the appearance and configuration of a
spherical flying complex of two Magnocrafts
type K3.
(Click on a given photo or drawing to see it enlarged.)
Fig. #C2a (left):
The enlargement of the section from the photograph
by Lars Thorn, showing the UFO vehicle hovering
on the background of a landscape. On this enlargement
the correctness of equation (F10) from [1/4] for the "K"
coefficient can be verified. (For a spherical flying
complexes this equation takes the form (F17): K=2D/H.)
For UFOs and Magnocrafts type K6 this coefficient takes
the value of K=6.
Fig. #C2b (middle):
The reconstruction of the appearance and shape
of this spherical complex of UFOs from the Thorn's
photograph, prepared on the basis of a computer
analysis of the photograph by the Stockholm
investigating group called GICOFF. This reconstruction,
together with the above photographs, is published
on page 81 in the book [1P2] by Adolf Schneider
and Hubert Malthaner: "Das Geheimnis der unbeakannten
Flugobjekte", Hermann Bauer Verlag KG - Freiburg
im Breisgau, West Germany, 1976, ISBN 3 7626 0197 6.
It very clearly reveals the double flange that fastens
the resultant complex half way of its height. This flange
is formed through coupling together the lens-shaped
side flanges of both vehicles. In the lower vehicle, the
outlet from the main propulsor is visible. In the upper
vehicle four so-called "black bars" are visible as they
stem from side propulsors. (Such "black bars" are also
illustrated in "Fig. #C10ab" below.)
Fig. #C2c (right):
The theoretically predicted appearance of a spherical
flying complex formed from two Magnocrafts type K3
(instead from two UFOs type K6 shown on the Thorn's
photo). A spherical flying complex of Magnocrafts (and
UFOs) is obtained when two vehicles of the same type
magnetically couple with each other by their floors.
(The theoretical shape and appearance of Magnocrafts
type K6 is illustrated in Figures F13 and F25 from monograph [1/4].)
In the lower part of this drawing shown is a
cut-away in the spherical complex of Magnocrafts
type K3 that illustrates the theoretical principle of
formation of such a complex. Shown are: the
orientation of magnetic poles (N, S) in the main
propulsor (M) and in subsequent side propulsors
(U); mutual location of crew cabins (1, 2) of both
vehicles; "onion charcoal" (C) which in special
circumstances settles on the (N) outlet from the
main propulsor; and the so-called "angel's hair"
(A) which is a kind of jelly hydraulic substance
(similar to white from eggs) positioned between
both vehicles in order to neutralize forces of mutual
attraction between their main propulsors. The
onion charcoal pills from UFOs during landing.
In turn angel's chair fall down after both vehicles
separate from each other. The silky strands of
angel's chair can frequently be spotted when
they lie on fields or hang from trees before they
have the time to evaporate.
It is worth to notice that the above photograph
and drawings are discussed comprehensively
in caption under the illustration "Fig. 9a-d" from
volume 13 of monograph [1/4], and also in subsection
P2.2 of that monograph [1/4], where the reader
can learn further details about vehicles illustrated
above. In turn a spherical flying complex of Magnocrafts
and UFOs is also discussed in "Fig. #D2" from the
totaliztic web page
explain.htm.
#C3.
The same location of propulsors in UFOs and in Magnocraft:
There is a wealth of evidence available,
which documents that in UFOs the propulsors
are located in exactly the same place as in the
Magnocrafts. Also the number "n" and the
orientation of propulsors in UFOs are identical
as in Magnocrafts.
The first group of such evidence consists of
photographs of UFOs in which the areas of
glowing air indicate the location of propulsors.
Perhaps the best known of these photographs
is the one taken over Butterworth, Malaysia,
and subsequently published in the 4th January
1979 edition of the newspaper "National Echo",
Penang. A copy of this photograph was presented
in the MUFON UFO Journal, February 1980
issue, page 8. This photograph is shown in
"Fig. #C3" below (while originally it was shown
in Figure P15 from monograph [1/4]). A similar
photograph, only that capturing a UFO of a slightly
different type from a side view (not from below),
was also taken in New Zealand above a small
fishing village called Motunau Beach
(click on this (green) writing in order to see the UFO photograph from Motunau Beach).
Fig. #C3ab:
Comparison of the location of propulsors
in a UFO type K3 and in a Magnocraft
type K3.The location of propulsors is revealed
due to patches of glowing air that is ionised by
a powerful magnetic field which outlets from
these propulsors yield to the environment.
The above photograph documents that propulsors
of Magnocrafts and UFOs are located identically.
It is worth to notice, that if the glow on outlets
from these propulsors is photographed in
colours, then it has a yellow or orange
colour at outlets from north "N" magnetic
poles of all propulsors, and a green or blue
at poles "S" from all propulsors. Just such colours
are documented in "Fig. #C11ab" from the further
part of this web page.
(Click on a given photo or drawing to see it enlarged.)
Fig. #C3a (left):
A UFO type K3 photographed from beneath while
hovering over Butterworth, Malaysia, on 3 January,
1979. The above photograph was published in the
January 4 1979 edition of the "National Echo",
Penang, Malaysia, and subsequently reproduced
in the February 1980 issue of the "Mufon UFO Journal",
page 8. The original copy of this photograph
turned out to be impossible for getting hold of,
thus I am showing here only its newspaper
copy. It shows the glowing areas appearing
at outlets from the vehicle's propulsors. (Although
the lowest of these propulsors did NOT ionise the
air at the moment of taking this photograph, but
that it does exist in this UFO it is indicated by an
empty space which it occupied.) The photograph
allows us to determine the location (and number
"n") of these propulsors in the vehicle's shell.
The mutual orientation of the propulsors (the main
one is placed in the centre of the UFO and is
surrounded by n=8 side propulsors), also their
number and positioning in relation to the edges
of the shell, correspond exactly to the details of
the K3 type of Magnocraft shown in part "b".
It is worth to mention that there is a significant
number of similar photographs which also show
UFO propulsors taken from different angles and
ion different modes of operation (e.g. at the moment
of taking them the air is ionised only under some
of these propulsors) -
click on this (green) writing in order to see an example of such photograph taken in New Zealand in Mutunau Beach.
Fig. #C3b (right):
A drawing of the Magnocraft type K3 seen from
underneath. It shows the location of vehicle's propulsors
during special atmospheric conditions (i.e. evening,
low light, moist air). The location of propulsors is then
disclosed by the glow of the air ionised by a powerful
magnetic field at outlets from these propulsors. When
the light is subdued these layers should be visible even
with the naked eyes. Blackened areas (marked U, V, W, X)
indicate the outlets of the side magnetic propulsors.
When the Magnocraft flies in the Southern Hemisphere,
the side propulsors should emit a reddish-yellow light
because their North (N) magnetic poles are oriented
downwards. Crossed lines show the outlet of the main
propulsor (marked M), which in the Southern Hemisphere
should emit a blue green light because its South (S)
magnetic pole points downwards. Note that these colours
are reversed (i.e. a reddish yellow replaces a blue green
and vice verse) when the Magnocraft flies in the inverted
position or changes hemispheres. Also, when viewed from
overhead, the outlets of the same propulsors have colours
which are the reverse of those seen from below.
It is worth to notice that a photograph of a UFO
similar to the above one, only that taken at night,
is also presented in "Fig. #C3a" from the totaliztic
web page
explain.htm.
#C4.
The utilization of magnetic interactions for producing the propelling forces:
UFOs, similarly as Magnocraft do, utilize
the principles of magnetic attraction and
repulsion for producing the propelling forces.
Such use of forces of magnetic interactions
by the propulsion system of UFOs, induces
a number of manifestations, which are now
able to be clearly identified. The most important
of these manifestations is the formation of
magnetic circuits. The presence of these
circuits in UFOs can be revealed on photographs.
Amongst numerous photographs showing
these magnetic circuits, the most evidential
is the one taken by Enrique Hausmann over
Mallorka, Spain. It is shown in "Fig. #C4b"
(originally in Figure P19 (D) from monograph
[1/4]). It presents the octagonal outlet from
the main propulsor of a K6 type UFO, from
which spreads five spirals of the spinning
field's strands. These strands are formed
from the force lines of the UFO's main magnetic
circuits - see the photograph from "Fig. #C4c.
Similar spiral strands of force lines, which
ionise particles of gas, are also captured
on the NASA photograph of a UFO shown
in Figure P29 from monograph [1/4]. The
Hausmann's photograph shows the UFO's
magnetic circuits in an overhead view.
There are other pictures also available,
which show the magnetic circuits of UFOs
in a different views. Their best example is
the photograph from "Fig. #C4a" - and compare
it with the upper part of "Fig. #C4c".
Fig. #C4abc: The comparison
of glowing "magnetic circuits" of UFOs
to "magnetic circuits" of Magnocrafts.
Such "magnetic circuits" are theoretically
predicted for the Magnocrafts. Thus in
order to formally prove that "UFOs are
already constructed and operational Magnocrafts",
such "magnetic circuits" must be also present
in UFOs. After making these circuits to spin,
the force lines of their magnetic field form a
kind of spinning brushes which at the moment
of hovering these vehicles above the surface
of the Earth sweeps thoroughly this surface.
Such a "magnetic brush", amongst others,
bends and directs precisely all blades of grass,
thus forming the characteristic UFO landing sites
known as "crop circles".
(Click on a given photo or drawing to see it enlarged.)
Fig. #C4a (left):
A night time photograph of two UFOs type K6
coupled into a "flying cluster". It was published
in the Journal [5P2] "UFO Sightings" (S.J.
Publications, Inc., 1141 Broadway, New York,
N.Y. 10001, USA), January 1981 edition,
page 15. This photo is the best presentation
known to the author of the magnetic circuits
of a UFO shown from the side view that is also
illustrated in the upper part of "Fig. #C4c".
It definitely confirms that the strands of magnetic
field force lines join the outlet from the vehicle's
main propulsor with the outlets from side propulsors.
The course of these magnetic circuits is visible
because they ionise the air with their powerful
magnetic field, which (the ionised air) glows
within the volume of these magnetic circuits.
Fig. #C4b (middle):
The photograph of the central section in a UFO
type K6 flying in the "magnetic whirl" mode of
operation. It was taken by Enrique Hausmann
over Mallorka (Palma Island), Spain, on 24
April 1950 - see the book [1P2] by
Adolf Schneider and Hubert Malthaner:
"Das Geheimnis der unbeakannten Flugobjekte",
Hermann Bauer Verlag KG Freiburg im Breisgau,
West Germany, 1976, ISBN 3 7626 0197 6, page 218.
The UFO travelled from east to west, appeared
to rotate, and produced a loud buzzing sound.
The photograph captures, from below, an outlet
of the vehicle's main propulsor of the second
generation (i.e. shaped into an octagon - see also
"Fig. C3b" and "Fig. C8(2i)" in monograph [1/4]).
Five strands of spinning force lines of the main
"magnetic circuits" are spiralling radial from this
outlet. At the edges of the photograph, each one
of these five strands splits into three separate
streams of the field's force lines. Notice that each
middle stream engages more energy from the
field than the two side streams. This results from
the sinusoidal distribution of the outputs from the
vehicle's side propulsors (to see why compare
the above photograph with Figure F25 (c) and
with the description from subsection F7.2 of
monograph [1/4]).
Fig. #C4c (right):
In the upper part the
Magnocraft
type K6 (i.e. for which K=D/H=6) is shown in
a side view. It illustrates the side appearance of
its whirling magnetic circuits. The polarity N, S
of its propulsors is indicated. All three "magnetic
circuits" are present and shown in one of their
many possible positions. The location of the
field's strands reflects the situation shown in
the lower part (B) of the same diagram.
In the lower part of this diagram shown are
whirling magnetic circuits of the
Magnocraft
type K6 in an overhead view. By a broken line
marked is the section of the vehicle which was
captured on the photograph from part "#C4b"
of this illustration. Notice that the thickness of
the successive strands of the field has a sinusoidal
distribution. For example, if the side propulsors
"V" (with the "blackened" outlet) have their maximal
output, the propulsors next to them (i.e. "U"
and "W" - with "dotted" outlets) are in the mean
value of their output, whereas propulsors "X"
(with "unmarked" outlets) produce no output at all,
while propulsors next to them repeats such a sinusoidal output cycle, etc.
This sinusoidal distribution of the magnetic field
reflected in the thickness of strands that link the
main propulsor with side propulsors, is caused
by the 90 degrees phase shift in pulsations of
subsequent side propulsors. Spirals formed by
such whirling strands of magnetic field that
change their thickness sinusoidal, are similar
to shapes of streams of water spread by a spinning
garden sprinkler.
#C5.
The formation of a pulsating magnetic field by propulsors of both considered vehicles:
UFOs not only utilise a strong magnetic field
for producing lifting and stabilization forces,
but this field also pulsates similarly to the one
produced by the propulsors of the Magnocrafts.
The best photographic confirmation of the pulsating
character of the magnetic output from UFOs,
is provided by the night time pictures that reveal
the multiple images of these vehicles - see "Fig. #C5a".
The principles used for the obtaining of such multiple
images are explained for Magnocrafts in "Fig. #C5b".
Fig. #C5ab:
Pulsating magnetic field of UFOs.
This is one example in the large class of
UFO photographs, all of which document
the pulsating character of the UFOs' magnetic
field. On each picture from this large class
(in monograph [1/4] several of them is reproduced),
it is only possible to see the fragment of the
vehicle's "magnetic circuit", which is oriented
in the direction of the photographer. (The
formation of "magnetic circuits" in UFOs
and Magnocrafts is explained in "Fig. #C4" and "Fig. #C6").
Notice that because of poor light conditions (night
or evening) and the high speed of the photographed
UFOs, the above pictures only capture flashes
of the air ionized by the strands of the pulsating
magnetic field, whereas the vehicles' shell
remains invisible. The scientific analysis of
flashes shown here can be a source of precious
information about the control over "twin-chamber
capsules" composed of UFOs'
Oscillatory Chambers.
(Click on a given photo or drawing to see it enlarged.)
Fig. #C5a (left):
A photograph of very fast moving UFO,
taken by Ken Chamberlain, over Quterbelt,
Ohio, USA, about 10 p.m. on 17 October 1973 -
see the earlier referred book [1P2] page 205.
This photograph shows a row of flashes identical
to these that are explained below for part "b"
of this "Fig. #C5". Please notice that there is a
huge number of night photographs of UFOs,
which all document similar flashes of "magnetic
circuits" of these UFOs. Only that on these other
photographs UFO vehicles flew with a different
orientation and in a different direction. Thus towards
the photographer were directed different sections
of their "magnetic circuits - which produced on films
shapes that are different from the shape explained
in the drawing from "Fig. #C5b" on the right side.
For these further examples of such flashes see
photographs which in monograph [1/4] were
shown in Figure P18(3)
(click on this (green) writing in order to see this photograph of flashing magnetic circuits of a UFO),
or on Figure P18(4)
(click on this (green) writing in order to see this photograph of flashing magnetic circuits of a UFO).
Fig. #C5b (right):
Explanations of principles for the formation of such
multiple images from a single "magnetic circuit" on
night photographs of Magnocrafts (and also UFO
spaceship) taken during the "throbbing" mode of
operation of these vehicles. In subsequent parts of
this illustration are explained:
(a) Outline of the Magnocraft (or a UFO)
with an indication of the layer of glowing air which
flashes when being ionized along a side "magnetic
circuit" (i.e. along the path of magnetic field force
lines which join the opposite outlets of the same side
propulsor). Because this layer of the air "flashes" in
rhythm of pulsations of the magnetic field yield to the
environment by a given side propulsor, while each
"flash" lasts just a short moment of time, the fast
motion of the vehicle leaves a chain of such flashes
spread along the trajectory this vehicle follows.
Symbols appearing on this part of the drawing:
V - speed vector, T - period of pulsation of the
magnetic flux (F) generated by side propulsors
of this vehicle, t - time.
(b) An illustration which documents what
would contain a photograph of this spacecraft taken at
night. Only the flashes from the air ionized by the magnetic
circuit of a side propulsor are visible in darkness. The
spreading of these flashes indicates the movement of
the propulsor during the time of film exposure.
(c) A curve F=f(t) of a variation in time (t)
of the magnetic flux (F) produced by the side propulsor
of the Magnocraft. This variation corresponds to the
"beat type curve" that is formed in the result of mutual
subtraction of two sinusoidal curves (for more comprehensive
description of principles and reasons of this subtraction
see the operation of so-called "twin-chamber capsule"
formed from
Oscillatory Chambers
of Magnocraft's propulsors - presented in subsection
C7.1 and in Figure C7 of monograph [1/4]). Such a
"beat-type curve" is composed from a straight line (i.e.
the constant magnetic flux of the value "Fo"), onto
which every period "T" is superimposed a short "pulse"
of the amplitude ΔF. The magnetic field whose
intensity pulsates according to such a "beat-type curve"
ionizes the air only when its value goes through a next
"peak". Therefore layers of air ionized by a vehicle's
magnetic circuits must appear as a chain of individual
flashes visible in part (a) of this drawing (instead of a
continuous glow).
#C6.
The formation of magnetic circuits:
Similarly as Magnocraft do, also UFOs form
numerous magnetic circuits. The documentary
value of these circuits depends on their forming
into loops that close through clearance of
subsequent propulsors of these vehicles.
Only in case when UFOs use a purely magnetic
propulsion system, identical to the propulsion
system of the Magnocrafts, they are going to
form magnetic circuits. In case of any other
propulsion system, such circuits would not be
formed, while the possible distribution of a field
around the vehicle would be completely different
than such a distribution around the Magnocrafts.
The best documentation of the existence of magnetic
circuits in UFOs, are photographs which capture these
circuits. There are numerous photographs which
show such circuits in UFOs. Their most spectacular
examples illustrate this item #C4. They are shown
in "Fig. #C4abc".
The existence of magnetic circuits in UFOs is
also excellently documented on landings of these
vehicles in crops. As this is explained e.g. in
subsection F11 from monograph [1/4], the so-called
"crop circles" and "pictograms" found in crop
fields of England, in fact are marks formed through
pushing down of crops by force lines of concentrated
magnetic field from these magnetic circuits. Therefore
"Fig. #C6ab" below is another confirmation for the
existence of magnetic circuits in UFOs.
Fig. #C6ab:
Examples of UFO landing sites formed
during low-level hovering of "flying
clusters" of UFOs above surface of crops.
Such UFO landing sites in crops are
popularly called the "crop circles" or
erroneously "pictograms". The above
examples illustrate the existence of
"magnetic circuits" in UFO vehicles.
After all, these are strands of force lines
of magnetic field from these magnetic
circuits that work like huge "brushes"
which gently bend towards the ground
every blade of the crop that stand on the
paths of these spinning magnetic circuits.
(Click on a given photo or drawing to see it enlarged.)
Fig. #C6a (left):
A photograph of a "crop circle" formed by a flying
cluster of UFOs type K6. The above circles, having
a total length of almost 50 meters, were photographed
in 1990 at Longwood Estate, Southern England.
It is worth noticing that the circles shown here include
all the elements explained in the right illustration
(i.e. "Fig. #C6b"). The only difference is that this
crop circle has two "tail" marks formed by the circuit
of rotary stabilization (Ts) which in UFOs fulfils the
same function as the "tail" propellers in present
helicopters - these marks are located by both units
positioned almost perpendicularly to the main axis
of the landing. Furthermore, this UFO landing does
NOT have marks from the "tuning" circuits (marked
"3" in the right "Fig. #C6b") - means that the "depth"
of this landing was higher from the span of these
tuning circuits "3".
Fig. #C6b (right):
An example of a smallest "flying cluster", which
simultaneously represents a basic link in every
larger flying cluster. Illustrated is one of the simplest
cases of the linear clustering together of two spherical
complexes type K6. The main advantages of the
resultant configuration include: ability to couple
together the Magnocraft (or UFOs) of any possible
arrangements and types (not only spherical complexes
shown here), preserving the original configurations
of vehicles that form the cluster, and flying the whole
cluster with only one pilot. A flying cluster is obtained
through the magnetic bonding of a number of independent
vehicles which do not touch one another. Such bonding
without physical contact is obtained by the formation
of two opposite types of magnetic circuits: i.e. those that
repel coupled vehicles (see circuits labelled (2) that
are shown with a broken line) and those that simultaneously
attract the vehicles (i.e. circuits (3) to (6)). The function
of the links for these circuits is performed by "unstable units",
i.e. vehicles whose propulsors produce only lifting and
attraction forces (i.e. no stabilization forces) - see the
complex on the right. Note that any other vehicles or
arrangements can be attached in addition to the above
cluster, with the condition that between every two stable
units an unstable unit is placed to link them together.
In the upper part (a) of this drawing, a
side appearance of a simplest linear cluster is
shown. Illustrated are: the polarization of propulsors
(N, S) in the coupled vehicles characteristic for the
Northern Hemisphere; examples of magnetic
circuits that provide each class of interactions
required between both vehicles (i.e. separating (2),
holding (4) to (6), tuning (3), and compensating
(Ts)); and the penetration of the ground (G-G)
by these circuits (this penetration causes the formation
of very distinctive landing marks shown in part (b)
from the lower part of the same drawing). Note
that to keep this illustration simple it has not been
shown that every side propulsor of the unstable
unit is either linked with the main propulsor of the
stable unit by a holding circuit (see (6)) or is
involved in a tuning circuit.
In the lower part (b) an overhead view
of a distinctive landing site which such a linear
cluster produces if it hovers at a low height with
the magnetic whirl mode of operation is illustrated.
The labels link each characteristic element of this
site with the appropriate class of magnetic circuits
that produces this element. Note that a change in
the height of the vehicles must result in a slight
alteration of the site's shape and main features.
It is worth to notice that still another photographs
of UFO landing sites in crops that were created
in a manner similar to that illustrated above, are
shown also in "Fig. #D8c" and "Fig. #D8d" from the
totaliztic web page
explain.htm.
#C7.
The formation of a magnetic whirl:
There are also numerous photographs
available, which prove that UFOs form
a magnetic whirl identical to the one
produced by the Magnocrafts. An
excellent example of such a whirl
was already presented in "Fig. #C4b".
The different photographs, which provide
another type of evidence for the existence
of these magnetic whirls in UFOs, are the
so called "ionic pictures of a whirl" - see
"Fig. #C7" shown below. In such pictures
of UFOs whirls, all the elements inferred
theoretically for the whirl of the Magnocraft
are present (compare Figure P20 to Figure
F27 in monograph [1/4]). They include,
amongst others: a block of the main swirling,
a pillar of central swirling, upper and lower
slipping points, etc. Notice that the correlating
sizes of these elements depend on the type
of UFO which created them and also on the
manoeuvre that this UFO was actually
performing.
Fig. #C7ab: A comparison of so-called
"ionic picture of a magnetic whirl" in a landed
UFO type K4, with the picture of the same magnetic
whirl formed in a Magnocraft.
(Click on a given photo or drawing to see it enlarged.)
Fig. #C7a (left):
A night time photograph of a landed UFO type K4
taken by an anonymous photographer in Genui,
Italy, on 23 June 1963 - see page 184 in the book
that in subsection P2.16 of monograph [1/4] is
referred under the number [1P2]. For the first
time the above photograph was published in the
Journal "Domenica del Corriere", 8 September
1963. The above photograph perfectly illustrates
the "ionic picture of the UFO's magnetic whirl"
and its similarities to the Magnocrafts' "ionic picture
of the magnetic whirl". Shown are all the elements
characteristic for such an ionic picture of a whirl.
The photograph also illustrates the three telescopic
legs extended to support the landed vehicle,
a ladder, and a set of periscopes allowing for
the visual observation of the environment. Notice
that the legs are located at an angle slanted towards
the vehicle's base.
Fig. #C7b (right):
An example of the "ionic picture of a whirl".
This picture represents the apparent shape
of the magnetic whirl surrounding an operational
Magnocraft or UFO (illustrated above is a whirl
formed by a motionless single Magnocraft type K3).
The visible part of the ionic picture is formed from
particles of ionized air (whose spin follows the rotation
of force lines of the magnetic field around the central
axis of the spacecraft). The outline of the vehicle is
indicated by a broken line. Continuous lines illustrate
the path of the three types of magnetic circuits formed
from the output of the Magnocraft's (or UFO's)
propulsors, i.e. C - central circuit looping through
the main propulsor only; M - main circuits passing
through the main and side propulsors; and S - side
circuits looping through the side propulsors only.
The force lines of these circuits are kept spinning
permanently. The blackened areas indicate the
shape which appears to an eye witness. The
characteristic features of this shape are: 1 - the
"upper slip point" of the central pillar; 2 - the pillar
of central swirling; 3 - the block of main swirling;
4 - the flange of side swirling; 5 - the bulges of
the lower part of the main swirling; 6 - the "lower
slip point" usually concealed behind the main
swirling and side swirling. Note that the motion
of the Magnocraft (or UFO) may change (disperse)
the visible shape of the magnetic whirl presented
here. Manoeuvres of the Magnocraft (or UFO),
or more strictly the change of proportion between
output from the main propulsor and outputs from
side propulsors, may also cause a distortion of
the picture shown here.
It is worth to notice that photographs similar to
the above one, that show in colours the "ionic
pictures of a whirl", is presented also in "Fig. #C5"
and "Fig. #C7" from the totaliztic web page
explain.htm.
#C8.
The induction of electric currents:
The ability of UFOs to induce electric currents
is confirmed by the numerous side effects
accompanying the appearance of these vehicles.
Some of these effects have been discussed
earlier, e.g. consider an inductive shield and
the plasma whirl (see "Fig. #C7ab"). But there
are also effects which directly involve the accumulation
of electric charges. An example of these can
be the electrical charging of non conductive
materials, e.g. hair or clothing. Below is a
description of the sighting that took place
along Route 133 near Sagamore Hill, Ipswich,
in the north east corner of Massachusetts,
USA, on September 3, 1965 - see [4P2] page 143.
"As his car approached the crest of the hill
overlooking Candlewood Golf Course, Dennis
felt the hairs rise on the back of his neck. As
he reached the top of the hill and started down
the other side, a feeling like static electricity
coursed through his body. Simultaneously he
was startled by a strange glow just off the road
to his left. Moments later he was almost broadside
to it. He noticed an object like an inverted saucer
with a flat dome floating nearby. Surrounded by
a weird grayish glow with a reddish tint, it seemed
about 12 meters in diameter. Dennis continued
his driving. He wanted no part of it."
Further numerous examples of inducing electric
currents by propulsion system of UFOs can be
found in an extensive literature on UFO subjects.
This include hair standing on ends - see "Fig. #C8ab"
below, electrifying of the air - see descriptions from
subsection U3.8 of monograph [1/4], and many
further phenomena.
Fig. #C8ab: The illustration of effects
of static electricity in the hair in an UFOnaut,
induced by the magnetic personal propulsion
of UFOnauts. Such electrified hair simply stand
on ends - as this is visible in part "a" above.
(Click on a given photo or drawing to see it enlarged.)
Fig. #C8a (left):
A UFOnaut calling himself "Ausso". This illustration
presents Carl Higdon's recollection of the alien
called "Ausso" who abducted him from the northern
edge of the Medicine Bow National Forest (south
of Rawlings), Wyoming, USA, on 25 October 1974.
It is published in the book [3R1] by Joshua Strickland,
"There are aliens on earth! Encounters",
ISBN 0 448 15078 6, page 16. The alien was about
1.88 meters tall and weighed approximately 82 kilograms.
He wore black shoes and was clad in a black, tight
fitting overall that resembled a diver's wet suit,
clasped by a heavy belt with a shining yellow
six pointed star and an emblem below the star.
"Ausso" was bow legged with a slanted head,
no chin, and one long appendage in place of
each hand. His hair was thin and stood straight
up on his head. I believe that it was because
his hair was electrified by the main propulsors
in his epaulettes. This is because descriptions
of that case suggest that he actually used the
design of his personal propulsion system which
utilised main propulsors located in epaulettes.
From the explanations by the Theory of the
Magnocraft, "Ausso" wore a version of the
personal propulsion garment with the main
propulsors located in the epaulettes (note
the reinforcing braces joining the belt with
the epaulettes, and dark clouds of ionised
air hovering just above his epaulettes). At
the ends of his arms (i.e. in the appendages)
additional enhancement propulsors were
located (for aiding heavy physical work) -
see Figure E4 "a" in monograph [1/4].
From the description available it can
be deduced that these enhancement
propulsors utilized a technological version
of telekinesis.
Fig. #C8b (right):
The version of "personal propulsion" with the
main propulsors assembled in the epaulettes.
Shown are: (1) one of the two main propulsors;
(2) the eight segment belt housing the side
propulsors; (3) one of the two bracelets placed
on the joints of the wrists. These bracelets contain
the additional enhancement propulsors (not used
for flights) which multiply the user's physical strength
when he or she performs heavy work.
The drawing also illustrates a hood for the head -
which is just to shield the hair of the user from the
electrifying, and also bat-wings like pelerine sawed
to the suit along the spine cord and back of sleeves -
which aerodynamically increases the smoothness
of flights (like a present day handglider). How such
pelerines of UFOnauts do look like after they are
spread for flights, it is revealed in "Fig. #4" from
the web page
sw_andrzej_bobola_uk.htm.
Note that to strengthen the reliability and steadiness
of this garment, sometimes two crossed braces
(suspenders) can additionally join the belt with
the epaulettes - visible in part "a" of the above
illustration.
It is worth to notice that photographs of UFOnauts
(but without hair standing on ends), are published
also in "Fig. #H2a" and "Fig. #H4a" from the totaliztic web page
explain.htm,
in "Fig. 1" to "Fig. 9" from the totaliztic web page
aliens.htm,
and in "Fig. #4" to "Fot. #6" from the totaliztic web page
sw_andrzej_bobola_uk.htm.
#C9.
The ability of UFOs to operate in all three modes of the Magnocraft's operation:
There is vast body of evidence already available,
which confirms that UFOs can operate in three
different modes of operation in which the Magnocrafts
are going to operate, namely in modes: (1)
"throbbing", (2) "magnetic whirl", and (3) "magnetic
lens". In each mode, the properties of UFOs
correspond exactly to those of the Magnocraft
when it operates in the same mode. (For details
of these three modes of operation of the Magnocraft -
see the descriptions from subsection F10 in
monograph [1/4]). The photographic evidence
documenting the operation of UFOs in a particular
mode can be classified into two categories,
depending on whether the particular picture
was taken during daylight or at night.
In the daytime photographs of UFOs operating
in the "throbbing" mode, the shapes and outlines
of these vehicles are very clearly shown - see
"Fig. #C1a" or "Fig. #C2a". But the daytime
photographs of UFOs operating in the magnetic
whirl mode reveal only various shapes of the
"ionic picture of a magnetic whirl", behind which
the real outlines of these vehicles are hidden -
similar to the picture visible in "Fig. #C7a".
With night time photography, the appearance
of UFOs changes drastically and the only visible
forms become the areas where the ionized air
emits a registerable glow. Thus, when UFOs
operate in the "magnetic whirl" mode, photographs
taken with a long time of exposure show only
a cloud of ionised and glowing air spinning
around these spacecraft - "Fig. #C4a" and
"Fig. #C12". In turn photographs taken with
a short time of exposure show only the spinning
magnetic circuits - see "Fig. #C4b". In turn
photographs of motionless, "throbbing" UFOs
taken with a delayed time exposure show only
the single glowing outlet from the main propulsor
located in the centre of the vehicle and a ring
of glowing outlets from the side propulsors
located along the flange - see "Fig. #C11".
The "magnetic whirl" of UFO vehicles and
Magnocrafts is also a source of several further
effects, for example the so-called "inductive
shield", and so-called "plasma saw". In turn these
further effects give to UFO vehicles and to Magnocrafts
rather extraordinary capabilities. For example
the "plasma saw" allows to drill in rocks unique
kind of long, glossy UFO tunnels, one example
of which is shown below in "Fig. #C9a".
Fig. #C9ab:
Smooth, long, straight, geometrically shaped,
and magnetized tunnels made during underground
flights of UFOs. Principles involved in the formation
of such tunnels, explained by the Theory of the Magnocraft
and illustrated as if the ground were transparent,
are shown in drawing from the right side ("Fig. #C9b").
Their final shape (i.e. elliptical or triangular) results
from the requirement that the base of a saucer-shaped
UFO must all times remain perpendicular to the force
lines of the local magnetic field.
(Click on a given photo or drawing to see it enlarged.)
Fig. #C9a (left):
The Cocklebiddy Cave on the Nullarbor Plain in
Western Australia. So far about 6 kilometers of
this straight, elliptical tunnel, directed exactly south-north,
have been investigated. Colour photographs are
published in [2FigO6] the Australian magazine
People (Weekly illustrated Magazine, 54 Park
Street, Sydney, NSW 2001, Australia), December 5,
1983, pages 8 to 10. Notice the cross-running
grooves on walls of this tunnel, which look as if
the tunnel was made by a huge drill. This particular
cave has the shape of a round tunnel that corresponds
exactly to the evaporation of the native rock by the
floor of a disk-shaped UFO.
Fig. #C9b (right):
The formation and characteristic attributes of tunnels
evaporated during underground flights of the Magnocraft
(or UFOs). Details are illustrated as they would be
observed if the ground were transparent and thus
revealing the tunnel and the vehicle which evaporates it.
The final shape of the tunnel is defined by the fact that
the Magnocraft (or UFO) during flights always tries to
keep its floor perpendicular to the local course of Earth
magnetic field. (This diagram from 8 March 1998 replaces
an older and less illustrative version that tried to explain
the same principle of formation of such tunnels.)
(a) Principle of evaporation of tunnels. It shows
the penetration of the native rock by a "plasma saw"
of the Magnocraft (or UFO) which changed the
direction of flight from the initial south to north,
into the final illustrated here from an east to west.
Symbols: 1 - the Magnocraft (or UFO) whose
magnetic field spins and thus produces a whirling
plasma saw, 2 - the spinning disk of the plasma
saw which cuts into the rock and evaporates the
tunnel, 3 - vapours of the rock that expand along
the tunnel already evaporated, 4 - rock rubble that
fell on the bottom of the tunnel behind the vehicle.
(b) The breach from the tunnel. Such a breach
is a crack in the native rock caused by the pressure
of compressed gasses that expand towards the
surface of the ground. It can later be used as an
additional entrance to the tunnel. Symbols: 5 - the
spewing of the rock vapours that forms a kind of
miniature volcano at the breach outlet (the presence
of this vapour discloses the location of the breach,
6 - the breach canal formed by the compressed
vapours expanding to the surface of the ground.
(c) An elliptical tunnel left by the Magnocraft (or UFO)
that flew in a north south or south-north direction.
Such a tunnel has an elliptical cross-section because
its shape reflects the circular shape of the vehicle
that flies with the base perpendicular to the environmental
magnetic field - see also parts (b) and (d) of Figure O6
from monograph [1/4]. Symbols: 7 - glossy walls
and ceiling of the tunnel (the close-up of their surface
must show hardened rock bubbles), 8 - the aerodynamic,
although rough and craggy "apparent floor" of the tunnel,
that represents the upper surface of the "rock bridge"
(in horizontal tunnels this floor is flat and relatively even
and dry, while in tunnels running under angle it has
a shape of hardened "dunes" and "bridges" through
which flows water), 9 - a "rock bridge" formed from
hardened particles of native rock which bury the lower
part of the tunnel (this bridge lies on the rock rubble),
10 - rock rubble that fills up the lower half of the tunnel
and covers the "real floor" of the tunnel, 11 - water that
accumulates in gaps between rock rubble and that
forms a stream which flows under an apparent floor
of the tunnel, 12 - the "real floor" of the tunnel along
which water flows, 13 - the range of magnetic, thermal,
and crystallographic changes in the native rock,
caused by the action on this rock of plasma and
field of the vehicle.
(d) A triangular tunnel formed by the Magnocraft
(or UFO) flying in an east west or west-east direction.
This shape results from reflecting in the rock the
side outlines of the vehicle that evaporates this
tunnel - see also part (a) of Figure O6 in monograph
[1/4]. Symbols: I - the angle of the vehicle's
inclination reflecting the course of the force
lines of the Earth's magnetic field and thus
also the slanting of triangular tunnels or the
degree of flattening of elliptical tunnels (or
more strictly the ratio of the horizontal to the
vertical axis). Symbols 7 to 13 have meaning
explained in part (c) of this Figure.
The above can be complemented with the information,
that photographs of several further underground
tunnels evaporated in the rock by UFOs, are
also published in "Fig. #F1" and "Fig. #F3" from
the totaliztic web page
newzealand.htm,
in "Fig. O6" from the totaliztic web page
magnocraft.htm,
in "Fig. #3" from the totaliztic web page
day26.htm,
and in "Fig. #11" from the totaliztic web page
korea.htm.
#C10.
The interference with electromagnetic radiation:
Observations of UFOs reveal that these
extraterrestrial vehicles also cause all
types of interference with electromagnetic
radiation, which is characteristic for the
Magnocrafts' propulsion. The three basic
types of this interference include: (1) TV,
radio, radar, and radio telephone disturbances,
(2) the so called "black bars", and (3) the
"magnetic lens" - see their descriptions
from item #10 in subsection F13 of monograph [1/4].
The strong correlation between the disturbances
in telecommunications (especially in TV reception)
and close range sightings of UFOs are often reported.
A summary of such electromagnetic disturbances,
as well as the descriptions of individual cases, can
be found in many UFO books - e.g. see books
referred to in subsection P2.16 of monograph [1/4]
under numbers [2P2] page 111, or [4P2] page 47.
This type of disturbances are also frequently
experienced by people flatting with ovule donors,
although many of them qualifies them as "natural
phenomena" and forget fast.
Columns of a strong magnetic field from propulsors
of UFOs frequently form the so-called "black bars"
envisaged for the Magnocraft s - see their description
in subsection F10.4 from monograph [1/4]. The
evidence for these black bars in UFOs is illustrated
below in "Fig. #C10", while their extensive discussion
is provided in subsection S1.1 from monograph [1/4].
Fig. #C10ab:
"Black bars" in a UFO. The above diagram illustrates
clearly that the "black bars" formed from a highly
concentrated magnetic field yielded by the propulsors
of a UFO are square in the cross-section. This in turn
provides further evidence that the propulsors of UFOs
utilize the so-called
Oscillatory Chambers
for the magnetic field production.
(Click on a given photo or drawing to see it enlarged.)
Fig. #C10a (left):
The diagram of a "spool-shaped" UFO presented
in the book which in monograph [1/4] is referred
under the number [5S1.1], page 11. It illustrates
a witness's recollection of the spaceship which on
May 9, 1969 abducted a soldier named Jose Antonio
da Silva from Victoria, Brazil. He was found 4 days
later in Bebedouro, 800 kilometres away. It is worth
to notice, that in spite this UFO vehicle was recreated
"from the memory" of the witness, still it reflects relatively
well the most vital components and the general
appearance of it.
From the point of view of the "Theory of the Magnocraft",
the illustrated spaceship represents the semi attached
configuration shown on the right in part (b) of the above
Figure. Because the "black bars" formed from the field
of this UFO in fact have square cross-section, thus their
outlines documented with this illustration provide further
evidence that UFOs really use "Oscillatory Chambers"
for the magnetic field generation.
Fig. #C10b (right):
One amongst two possible principles of the formation
of a so-called "semi-attached configuration" obtained
through coupling together by their topside domes two
vehicles type K3, mutually facing each other - see also
class #2 in Figure F6 in monograph [1/4] (this Figure
F6 is also shown as "Fig. #5" on the web page
propulsion.htm).
The "Theory of the Magnocraft" reveals that in the
principle of forming such a configuration illustrated
here, between the main propulsor of the lower spacecraft
and the side propulsors of the upper vehicle there
must appear columns of a highly concentrated magnetic
field that traps light and therefore are visible as "black bars".
These "black bars" are intentionally shown on the sides of
vehicle illustrated above - they give to the configuration the
appearance of an "asymmetrical spool". The cross section
of these "black bars" must reflect the shape of the devices
used to generate the magnetic field in the propulsors of
these vehicles, i.e. if Oscillatory Chambers of the first generation
are used for this purpose, the cross-section of the columns
must be a square.
Independently from the shown above principle
of the formation of a "semi-attached configuration"
of Magnocrafts, a similar configuration can also be
obtained when all propulsors in both couples vehicles
have the same magnetic pole directed in the same
directions. In this case the "black bars", if appaer,
link outlets from side propulsors of both vehicles -
thus the entire configuration looks like a "symmetrical
spool". This second principle of the formation of
"semi-attached configuration" of Magnocrafts is shown
in "Fig. #5b" from the web page
memorial.htm - about ways UFOnauts undermine the evidential value of authentictic photographs of UFOs.
It should be added here that effects of the operation
of completely different interference of the magnetic
field of UFOs with the electromagnetic radiation,
depending on the formation of so-called "magnetic
lens", is shown and discussed on "Fig. #C9" from
the totaliztic web page
explain.htm,
and on "Fig. 6a" from the totaliztic web page
memorial.htm.
#C11.
The relationship between the colour of glow of the ionised air and a magnetic pole of a given propulsor:
According to the "Theory of the Magnocraft",
in the "throbbing mode of operation" of magnetic
propulsors, the outlet from each opposite pole
of this propulsors must glow in a different colour.
At the north magnetic pole "N" (i.e. at the "inlet"
of the magnetic field "I") the air glows in a
yellow-orange colour. In turn at the south magnetic
pole "S" (i.e. at the "outlet" of the magnetic field "O")
of the propulsor the air glows in a blue-green colour.
(Notice the different than in Physics notation of
magnetic poles, described in subsection F5.2
from volume 3 of monograph [1/4]) On all colour
photographs of glowing UFOs such visibility of
different colours of air glow at outlets from vehicle's
propulsors working in the "throbbing mode of
operation" is confirmed - see "Fig. #C11" below.
Fig. #C11ab:
Two night photographs of UFOs flying in a "throbbing"
mode of operation, which document two different colours
in which glow the air ionised at the outlets from the
vehicles' propulsors. These two colours of glow are
explained in caption from "Fig. #C3b".
(Click on a given photo or drawing to see it enlarged.)
Fig. #C11a (left):
A single frame from a colour movie film of a UFO
taken at night by Ellis E. Matthews above Alberton,
South Australia, in 1967 - see the book by Bruce
Cathie & P.N. Temm, "Harmonic 695" (Wellington,
N.Z., 1971, ISBN 0 589 01054 9) page 134.
It presents a stationary vehicle type K5 hovering
in darkness in the "throbbing mode of operation".
The film captured only a glow of air, ionized by the
magnetic field from the vehicle's propulsors. In turn
the main body of the UFO remained invisible in
darkness. In the above photograph the colours of
the glowing air provide perfect confirmation for the
statements of the "Theory of the Magnocraft".
The air at the single outlet from the main propulsor,
whose axis is slanted from the centre of vehicle,
glows a yellow-orange colour, whereas the ring
of outlets from the side propulsors induces a
blue-green glow. This means that the UFO's
topside was oriented towards the photographer,
so in the main propulsor a north (N) magnetic
pole prevails, whereas in the side propulsors
their south (S) poles are displayed - see also
"Fig. #C3b" which describes colours of the air
glow at outlets from Magnocrafts' propulsors.
Compare the colours from this frame of movie
taken in the southern hemisphere of the Earth,
with the colours in the photograph from part (a)
of this illustration that was taken in the northern
hemisphere of the Earth. (Notice that in the
different hemispheres the polarity of the UFOs'
magnetic propulsors must be reversed.)
Fig. #C11b (right):
A night photo of a UFO type K3 flying in a "throbbing"
mode of operation. The above photograph (originally
in colour) was taken on 2 August 1965 by 14 year old
Alan Smith, over Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA - see [1P2]
page 241 and [2P2] page 371. In the centre of this
UFO, at the outlet from its main propulsor, a layer of
ionized air glowing a blue colour is visible. In turn around
the vehicle's flange the air ionized by the magnetic field
from the side propulsors is glowing a yellow-red colour.
The non glowing main body of the UFO remains invisible
in darkness. Compare the above photograph with
"Fig. #C3b" and also with part (a) of the above illustration.
#C12.
The magnetic manner of flying which contradicts laws of hydromechanics:
If UFOs utilize the Magnocrafts' principles
of operation, their behaviour in space should
be described by the laws of magnetism, not
by the laws of hydromechanics. We know that
the aerodynamic flight of contemporary
aeroplanes is controlled by a set of laws
of hydromechanics. From these laws the
main attributes of present flying machines
result, such as: aerodynamic shapes, the
existence of various aerodynamic protrusions
(wings, rudders, stabilizers) attached to every
aircraft, smooth, flowing flights, turning with
large radiuses, etc.
If we now consider those vehicles whose operation
is based on laws of magnetism - not on laws of
aerodynamics (e.g. Magnocrafts and UFOs),
their attributes must be completely different from
those of aircraft. For example, the magnetic
vehicles are not required to have aerodynamic
shapes and thus may fly with their flat surface
(e.g. with a floor) pointed towards the direction
of movement. But their shells must fulfil the set
of equations which results from laws of magnetism
(which are listed in Figure F18 from monograph [1/4]).
They will not have any controls or protrusions,
as their flight and manoeuvres are achieved by
appropriate changes in outputs from the magnetic
propulsors hidden inside their shells. Also their
behaviour in space will be drastically different from
that of contemporary aircraft, because they must
obey laws of magnetism.
The magnetic character of UFO flights can also
be determined from an analysis of shapes that
the "ionic picture of a whirl" shows on some
photographs. In the photograph from "Fig. #C12a"
a formation of flying UFOs is captured. These
vehicles' have "ionic pictures of a whirl" which
display a very unusual "shoe" shape. We know
from the mechanism which forms such ionic
pictures that unless special dynamic conditions
occur which cause the deformation of these
pictures, their shape should be symmetrical
to
