|
{IF COUNTLESS BILLIONS OF WOMEN WERE KILLED WOULD THAT BE SEXISM?}
Just look at the way men were treated in 'war' and we can see that if
this were committed upon any other group, be they Jews, women, blacks
or whatever, then it would be named genocide. Hitler named Jewish only
death camps 'work camps'. Society names male-only draft 'Conscription'.
Women have never been forced into conscription, but yet they have the
majority vote on whether or not MPs are pro-male-only-draft. This means
that they have the majority vote on whether or not genocide is
committed against men. This can't go on. It's time that 'women's vote'
only has an effect on the wars in which their sex are forced to fight
in. Also, why do we call this 'equality' when it's really sexism
against men? It's clear that there's actually been a huge amount of
sexism and we need to make compensation to men for thousands of years
of mistreatment, abuse, and genocide. Now some may say but women were
also treated badly. True but women were only treated as property
where-as men were treated as less than this--- property was worth
something. And anyway, the matriarchy is happy for women to be treated as something that is cherished.- They conceived, and nurtured, the idea.- They didn't care that men weren't getting such nice treatment. And as they were, and are, in control- that is despicable.
Again people may say, but wasn't it male rulers who decided which sex
went to war? No, the governments are just a handful of people. Without
the help of society the government is nothing and has no power. The
real culprit for forcing men out to war was society and the pressure it
brought to bear. This is all nicely articulated in a film called the
white feather. In which men were handed white feathers by women who
were fuelled by hatred of men(misandry). The white feather meant that
he was a 'coward'. Something that men were regularly shot for back
then. They were put in front of a firing line and had several high
powered rifles blast them in the chest. The same fate happened any man
whom had shells blowing up around him if his nerves went. This often
happened in the two world wars.... Now how about just looking at
societies double standard there. A mother has difficulty with her child
crying and she murders it, now
society's attitude is one of absolute care and compassion. Compared
with the poor man whose nerves go on the front line.
By the way, when women got 'into power' then they sent men to their
deaths in equal numbers. See Ghandi, Thatcher, ad infinitum.
Another point is: do we really want our sons to be more disposable than
your daughters?
Also: males have their children stolen in billions [even though fathers
are the safer parents, by far], and all laws are harder on males than
on females. Now the question is whether society is a matriarchy or a
patriarchy. The answer is obvious, it's run by females. Know we know
who to blame for genocide against men.
Copyright © Spencer Mewha - All rights reserved
Domestic
violence Statistics Here
Mail to:
STANDING
UP WITH DADS
Do
try to make contact. If we can't do it for our selves then we should do
it for our children. They do need us. For example fathers are far
safer-parents, by far.
|
|