Implementation of the plan will eliminate the destruction of society
that has been caused by feminism. In one generation, feminism will no
longer exist. The Plan is now necessary as there is no evidence of feminist
ideals being replaced by socially responsible, logical, fair and equitable
policies that will allow men the freedom to be men.
All young men will avoid having his life destroyed by the mechanisms
that women have put in place to take his possessions and income. Men
must avoid any long-term contact with a female. She has established
laws that enable her to take his possessions and his income if he spends
more than a few months with her. Men need to become men again, when
it comes to relationships with women. No relationship should last more
than a few months and no relationship should be limited to one female
at a time. Females have taken from man everything that nature and millions
of years of evolution have given him to adapt and survive on this planet.
Women have altered social forces to mould a man’s behaviour in
a way that contravenes nature and threatens man’s survival. If
men were to behave like men, no woman would be able to use the courts
to take his home or a proportion of his income.
Men can stop the theft of his sperm by having it harvested and stored,
he can then receive a vasectomy. The vasectomy delivers the freedom
for men to regain their sexual freedom that women have used to punish
and enslave men. Without access to his sperm, a woman cannot become
impregnated and enslave the man to her by using the child support mechanisms
that she has implemented.
Using surrogates will give men full control over reproduction. The
aim of the vasectomy is not to sterilise men, the objective is to completely
deny women unauthorised access to his sperm. Men must then be very careful
about whom they allow to bear his children. No man should ever become
emotionally attached to a female. Men must never confuse their protective
instincts and sexual attraction with the female’s word “love”.
A man’s love for a woman is based on an instinct to protect combined
with sexual attraction. Companionship with a woman might be quirky but
companionship does not require cohabitation or exclusivity. Quite frankly,
companionship with a female becomes quite dissatisfying once the novelty
wears off and the man realises just how dull she really is. This is
why it is important to eventually have two women for every man. Having
two women will reduce the level of boredom experience by men as they
can alternate the time spent with each woman.
A man’s love for his children is based on his duty to protect
and to educate. Companionship is important and the companionship between
father and child is necessary for socialising children and to develop
them into strong and confident adults.
At a time when a man feels compelled to procreate he must do so using
IVF techniques and will need to employ specialist services to ensure
that only male embryos will be produced. The male sperm dictates the
sex of children so men inherently possess the ability to control the
proportion of females in society. There is no need for more females
in society than what is required to satisfy a man’s sexual urges
and to incubate a man’s children. In the initial stages men will
completely eliminate all X chromosome sperm for 5 years as a display
of control over the number of females in society. There are methods
that can be used to control sperm carrying the X chromosome so this
control over the proportion of females is currently available. The resulting
change in the population balance will be used to remove all females
from office and subsequently remove all remnants of discriminatory feminist
legislation.
Once all signs of feminism are destroyed, men will be able to increase
the proportion of women in society. Ultimately, men may increase the
number of women in society to 66% thus providing two women to meet the
needs of every man. Men must be vigilant as any sign of women attempting
to revive feminism will lead to the immediate destruction of all X chromosome
sperm for 5 years to remind women that men have total control over their
numbers.
Men should only engage the service of surrogates to gestate their children.
The terms of the surrogacy must be made very clear as the female incubator
must have not rights to the child whatsoever. The traditional “mother”
figure must be completely removed from the daily care of all children.
If breastfeeding is desired, then contract the services of a wet nurse.
Childcare facilities are currently in place to look after children while
men work and these should be used to assist men achieve their personal
ambitions while raising their children. Although many current childcare
workers are unfortunately female, this will change once the first generation
of ‘The Plan’ is complete. Child care facilities and schools
should not have too many females employed as they are inappropriate
role models for children. In the mean time, fathers can refuse to have
any female looking after his children in child care thus forcing child
care facilities to employ more men.
The availability of these services eliminates the need for the negative
influences that mothers have in the life of children. We have witnessed
the results of fatherlessness in feminist society yet it has become
the preferred family structure. The motherless family, however, will
result in higher levels of education, a greater sense of justice among
children and a much more accurate moral compass, the likes of which
existed before feminism eliminated fatherhood.
In the Short-term
Men must immediately cease dealing with any female employee or business
owner when seeking goods and services. Feminism has taken control of
the labour market via the supply of labour through Nazi style discriminatory
legislation. The only way to combat this type of discrimination is to
thwart it from the demand side. While consumers still have the freedom
to choose with whom they wish to deal, we can alter the balance. It
is very clear that businesses owned by women tend to only employ women;
these businesses must be avoided at all costs.
When dealing with any business or government department, seek out male
employees and deal only with them for any transaction that may have
a positive outcome for the organisation. Men must also deliberately
seek out female staff for complaints or other issues that will negatively
impact the organisation. Men must limit all complaints against employees
to females in order to highlight their incompetence and to counter their
illegitimate positions in the workforce.
The purpose is to create a situation where male employees are clearly
more profitable to the organisation than female employees. All men must
immediately initiate this short term strategy to shift the balance in
the labour market. This strategy is particularly important in any environment
where bonuses, incentives or commissions are awarded for staff. Male
consumers have the power to combat anti-male discrimination in the workplace
and must do so immediately. Men must insist on giving all profitable
business to men only!
Men need to immediately cease all use of femispeak (also known as political
correctness). No man should ever use the title Ms as there is no such
title in traditional English. For females the choice of title is Mrs
or Miss. Men need to start using humour to ridicule women in the same
way women ridicule men. For example, “How many militant feminists
does it take to change a light bulb? Two; one to make me a cup of coffee
while I supervise the other stupid bitch.” Why is it politically
incorrect to ridicule women yet perfectly acceptable to ridicule men?
Men need to redress the lack of male oriented language. Words like
masculist and masculism must be added to all dictionaries to redress
the imbalance in the English language. If a university conducts subjects
in “women’s studies” then that university must be
avoided at all costs and discredited in any way possible. It is interesting
to note that the existence of women’s studies illustrates the
vanity and over inflated sense of self-importance held by women (let’s
talk about me).
The Need for Change
The female is greedy, materialistic and assesses the suitability of
a mate on his wealth. She purports to be loving, caring, affectionate
and tender but uses these as a mechanism to feed her materialistic greed.
She will offer these emotions to lure others and if she is denied whatever
she seeks she will withdraw those emotions completely. She will use
the same techniques on small children to confuse them and emotionally
scar them for life. She is completely manipulative, unable to function
independently where she will be exposed for the incompetent fraud she
is. She lacks rational thought and logic allowing her venomous emotions
of jealousy and fear to override any modicum of intelligence she thinks
she has. She will surround herself with female friends but hates every
one of them for what they might have that she doesn’t. She is
spiteful and exists for revenge. Every decision she makes is based purely
on what she can gain. She mistakes punitive rage and revenge for justice.
When she punishes a child it is done with anger. She is superficial
and bases her pleasure and happiness on material gains. She is lazy
and will attach herself to the success of others. She relies on others
to provide what she needs and will only work for her own gains when
all other sources of revenue and wealth are exhausted. She believes
that the world owes her and will take whatever she can from welfare
or any other handout available. She is so preoccupied with her self-deification
of motherhood that her delusions lead her to believe that her womb is
the centre of the universe and all must pay homage to mother. She is
cold and lacks real passion. What she believes is lust is nothing more
than greed. She is a prostitute that only gives for material gain. She
exists in self-denial knowing she is a whore but refuses to admit it.
The female offers nothing useful other than a womb in which to gestate
a foetus. She is not sexually driven to procreate. She fakes willingness
to seduce a man into believing that she is attracted to things other
than his wallet. She has no shame, guilt or remorse when she misleads
others into believing that she cares for them. Her attachment to her
children is nothing more than a means to ensure that she will continue
to receive continued materialistic gain from motherhood. Historically,
she only kept her mate under the same roof to ensure that his roof stayed
over her head and to provide some ongoing physical protection. She has
since crafted mechanisms to ensure that the government transfer his
roof to her and to have the laws introduced that guarantee women all
the protection that a perpetual victim needs and more than she deserves.
She no longer has a need for the close proximity of a man and will use
the state to take all that he owns and all that he works for. Every
female is nothing more than a succubus! She will sometimes kill her
host but is usually too incompetent or lazy to do so.
Her dishonesty toward men is limitless to the point where she says
size doesn’t matter but will bitterly complain about his size
to all and sundry as soon as she has taken from him what she wants.
She will always complain most about those she claims are closest to
her. Totally devoid of any conscience or sense of justice, she will
do anything to extract whatever she wants from a man. No act or deed
is too evil in her pursuit of material gain. Because her greed and envy
are so fundamental to her existence, after expelling one man, she will
continue in her quest to find new men to exploit. She will even prey
on her own kind; lesbians will assess the suitability of a “partner”
based on what she can get out of her. When both are trying to extract
some material gain from the relationship it will get very nasty.
She has no consideration for the emotional and moral welfare of children
she mothers as she expels their father from the home. She will alienate
the father from the children and turn them against him. She uses the
media to paint their father as an inept idiot, a buffoon, while paradoxically
relying on his natural intelligence and skill to sustain her financially.
She will happily drive a man to suicide, and if that fails she can murder
him and get away with it. She has manipulated the court system to provide
a barrage of defences for murdering a spouse that are only available
to her. She will kill her children if there is the chance of some greater
material gain (e.g. a wealthier boyfriend) and has orchestrated a barrage
of defences for killing her babies.
GIRLS CAN DO ANYTHING – AND GET AWAY WITH
IT!
When she kills, she does it brutally. In the interest of protecting
children, it is necessary for men to remove children from the female
as soon as they are weaned. Once she has given birth and the children
are weaned, her usefulness is spent ‘til she falls pregnant again.
In her bid to remain completely blameless for the evil in which she
revels, she apportions all blame onto men; this in the fundamental tenet
of feminism. While lacking useful intelligence she does possess cunning
and has used it to convince everyone that her victims are to blame.
When she kills a man it is now assumed that he deserved it. When she
kills her babies it is now assumed that they must have been too demanding.
When she attacks a child she is not taken into custody, she is sent
for psychological evaluation. She has successfully convinced society
that her inherent evil is a medical condition that requires treatment.
Her treatment consists of her feminist aids, abettors and co-conspirators
(psychologists, politician, judges and police) affirming her actions
and labelling her as “brave”. For crying out loud, what
would happen if a man committed the same despicable acts?
Her feminist ideals are completely hypocritical. She detests everything
a man represents but she wants to be like him. She wants equality but
now that she has her “female only” government departments,
clubs, societies and gymnasia she refuses to allow men to have their
own. It all relates to her greed and envy. She will turn against men
to become a lesbian. When she does, she changes her appearance to be
more like a man. If lesbianism is the ultimate celebration of femininity
then why imitate masculinity? Women aspire to becoming men but lack
the intelligence and ability to compete. Some women are fighting to
make it illegal for men to stand whilst urinating. All of this proves
that women are the worst sufferers of penis envy!
As an incomplete male, the female spends her life pursuing everything
a male possesses. As a child, she learns to mimic the characteristics
she observes in men but lacks the understanding of masculinity to display
or use those attributes appropriately. She attempts to show strength,
courage, independence, integrity, vitality and passion. But her underlying
and inherently female traits of vanity, greed, envy, insecurity, weakness
and sloth lead her to misuse the attributes learned from men. She will
use quasi masculine behaviours to appeal to her vanity, satisfy her
greed, reverse her envy onto others, unscrupulously obtain security,
hide her weakness and support her sloth. Any role-play of a masculine
trait is only made to achieve material gain or hide her lack of ability.
She has attempted to claim that she possesses the male traits necessary
to build a fair and just society but look at how society has changed
since the onslaught of irrational feminist idealism. Is society safer,
fairer or more just than it was 30 years ago? What will another 30 years
of her self-indulgent greed and envy bring to society?
She knows that the naturally superior intellect and skill of men will
prevail so she does all she can to suppress it. After expelling male
role models from the family and education system, she works endlessly
to turn her male children into girls. She denies her boys the toys and
games that men traditionally played with in their youth. She has successfully
made many of the toys illegal. She punishes any display of masculinity.
She has introduced policies into schools to ensure that the slightest
display of masculinity by boys is severely punished. She has distorted
all social norms to the point where men who behave as men could be found
guilty of committing a criminal offence or sued.
In her bid to apportion blame to anyone but herself, she blames men
for things like war and attempts to explain man’s involvement
in war as a need to compensate for sexual dysfunction while she reclines
on her sofa, enjoying the freedom that the death of her forefathers
handed to her. If men did not die to defend her, would she be able to
fully explore her greed and envy the way she does today? If feminism
took hold in the 1920’s we would all be saluting the rising sun
and reading Mein Kampf today.
Feminism has fought to breakdown social codes and, in this endeavour,
it has been quite successful. Look at the result. It is now acceptable
to use any profanity at all in any media at any time in front of children
and the elderly. Offensive language no longer exists as feminists have
made it perfectly acceptable to swear freely in schools, churches, nursing
homes and child minding facilities. Men had the decency to keep offensive
language off the street and out of the reach of children.
With so much societal change implemented by feminism one would have
expected something to be done to eliminate the money system as professed
by the ultimate feminist lunatic, Valerie Solanis. The truth is, without
the money system, a female will have nothing to feed her greed and no
material wealth to extract from a man’s knowledge and skill. This
fact alone debunks the bunk that Solanis wrote about men and money.
A more informed examination, backed by economic theory, supports the
following analysis.
The reason for women maintaining and taking control of the money system
include:
Motherhood and Mental Illness (Munchausen's Syndrome by Proxy, Mania,
Postnatal Depression and Schizophrenia):
Fathers instinctively protect their children and it has been proven
that this instinct is very strong. One must wonder why a biological
father would have such a strong instinct. Upon what threat is this protective
instinct based? The answer is quite simple – the mother. Mothers
harm babies! Women have applied a variety of labels to excuse their
use of violence to satisfy their vanity, greed, envy and vindictiveness.
These excuses have been elevated to the status of mental illnesses.
Women who are conveniently diagnosed as having Munchausen's Syndrome
by Proxy (MSP) will fabricate symptoms of medical problems in their
children, thus subjecting the child to unnecessary medical tests and/or
surgical procedures. The mother may inflict injuries and may kill her
children in the process. This is an attention-seeking behaviour to indulge
the female’s need to feel “special”. A mother pretending
to suffer mania will neglect her baby because she feels that she has
so many other things to do – her shopping, making her own plans,
rearranging her home and her life (me, me, me). Her baby is at serious
risk of neglect while the greedy female satisfies her self-indulgent
needs. A mother who convinces others that she is depressed may kill
her baby for no reason at all. The laws on infanticide have been manipulated
to allow a woman who kills her baby, within a year and a day of giving
birth, to get away with murder because she is “mentally ill”.
A mother who is conveniently diagnosed as having Schizophrenia can say
that she believes that her baby is strange - a changeling, or the devil
(Oh please!). She will then use these beliefs as an excuse to harm her
children as she transfers her own evil attributes upon the innocent
child.
The mother will use the government supplied mechanisms that women have
put in place to expel the father from the family so that she may wallow
in her self-induced pseudo madness and allow her to manipulate and harm
the children without the father there to protect them. Women have used
trendy feminist ideals to promote their propaganda that has warped society
into believing that a mother can do no harm. Medical research however,
proves the contrary. The mother is so self-absorbed that she only has
children to improve her image and status in terms of the artificially
induced attitude that mothers are ‘good’. Totally void of
any unique contribution that a woman can make to society, she has promoted
the deification of motherhood to the point where society will excuse
a mother of any evil doing. A mother has no interest in what is best
for children. Children are merely a means by which she will elevate
her own synthetic status, accumulate wealth from the father and vicariously
attach some meaning to the life she has wasted through her sloth. She
imparts her attitudes and behaviour toward all others onto her children,
her negative attributes of vanity, greed, envy, vindictiveness and sloth
become an everyday part of her children’s life with no moderating
influence from a male role model. Through a generation of feminist control
over family structure, education, government policy and the legal system,
we are now witnessing the antisocial female attributes in today’s
children, the media and in within our community.
The vital role of the father in giving a child a successful future
has been confirmed by a 40-year study into the lives of thousands in
the United Kingdom. The study concluded that close paternal involvement
improves academic performance, relationships and health. The presence
of a father results in children being less likely to commit crime. Fathers
teach values, beliefs and skills. Fathers provide the moral compass
for their children. The father instils a sense justice and prepares
his children for mastery in the world. He shares his knowledge, skills
and perspectives about life. He helps his children to develop their
self-identity and self-esteem. Fathers live with purpose, industriousness,
faith, goodness and hope and they pass on their steadiness, conviction
and determination to persevere under adverse circumstances. Fathers
prepare children to take risks, to push themselves, to be competitive,
to be courageous, and to measure up to demands. Fathers also teach responsibility
and accountability. His strength and willingness to be an authority
figure sets limits and consequences to actions. His high expectations
of himself and others, imparts a strong work ethic, initiative and independence.
Unlike the lazy mother, fathers know how to play. Before the mother
expels the father, they can be observed in parks and other play areas.
The father will be kicking the ball, pushing the swing and throwing
the Frisbee while the mother reads a book, paints her nails or gazes
vacantly into a mirror. The children learn to be active through play.
Fathers teach and promote a sense of humour that does not derive amusement
from the misfortune or ridicule of others. The few women that might
display what some describe as a sense of humour only make jokes about
men and children; again, this is done to hide their inadequacies and
elevate their own status. The female comedian exploits children and
men through deriving an income from ridiculing them.
The father will teach his children to get off their arse and do something
invigorating that involves interaction with others and the environment.
Activities will include competitive sports, high risk adventure, vacations,
and outdoor experiences. Through rough play and hardship, fathers teach
toughness and survival. Unlike mothers, fathers are not complainers,
excessive worriers, or break down under pressure.
A Father protects and provides. The mother exploits this attribute
with no sense of morality or justice. She will expel the children’s
father then use the mechanisms she has put in place to take everything
he owns and everything he earns until the children are adults. A woman’s
greed extends no further than filling her pockets today. She will squander
every cent as soon as she receives it and will not put any money aside
for her children’s future. After all, she takes the father’s
money for herself, not for her children. A father cares about the next
generation and will work hard to provide opportunities for his children’s
success and future generations. Fathers understand sacrifice and will
go without in order to care for his children and their children.
Mothers will force children to engage in mind-numbing, introspective
activities in order to deprive them of experiences that will enable
them to make social observations that will expose her disgusting self-centred
attributes. She abhors competitive sport due to her own lack of drive
to be competitive at anything that is not driven by greed or envy. She
will deny them the opportunity to gain independence through taking risks
and other adventurous behaviour because she thrives on her children’s
continual dependence. Without the children’s dependence she has
no sense of worth from the artificial status she has placed on motherhood.
She exploits her children. She uses them as bargaining chips in negotiations
with the children’s father and other relatives. They are her meal
ticket; she expels the father and retains the children to secure her
ongoing income. As a child outgrows his child support he will be expelled
and replaced with another when the succubus hunts down another male
host and steals his sperm.
The mother excludes the male to perpetuate her disgustingly selfish
female ideals. Without the father she can reduce the impact that masculinity
has on exposing her self-centred sadistic nature. She forces her son’s
to be girls. She stops them from developing a sense of adventure and
will punish them for any display of independence. She is consumed with
envy knowing that her sons can be everything that she cannot. Her jealousy
drives her to do anything to stifle her sons’ development. She
will use guilt, shame and blame to stop the father or any male role
model from developing her sons’ masculinity. She will chastise
the father for using rough play, fostering competitiveness or developing
the boys’ sense of humour. She is repulsed by such behaviour because
it is out of her reach.
The effect of motherhood on boys makes them lazy, greedy, vain, uneducated,
unskilled, shy, cowardly, weak, stupid, illiterate, innumerate, compliant,
spiteful, rude, discourteous, insecure, sad and unmotivated. A male
with these attributes cannot compete in the labour market so the only
means of survival available to him are crime and welfare. We know this
to be true as today’s social landscape makes it self-evident.
It does not take a trained sociologist to see how teenage boys without
fathers behave today. Her increased influence over boys aims to crush
his drive and ambition to be something greater that the ineffectual
lump of day time television consuming, oxygen wasting excrement that
his mother is. When she wrings out the last ounce of his drive and snuffs
out his dreams of contributing to the world, he is ready to become a
passive victim of female greed. If he does enter the workforce, he will
not pose a significant threat to the incompetent women around him.
The effect of motherhood on girls perpetuates every negative attribute
she possesses. Displays of her own prostitution teach a girl that the
only thing of value she possesses is her sexuality. Young girls that
don’t have close contact with their father use their sexuality
for profit at a very early age. Real research proves that girls without
their biological father are far more likely to become pregnant in their
early teenage years. The acceptable social norms set by mothers for
young girls have deteriorated to the point where preteen girls can be
observed wearing shirts with “M.I.L.F. in training” printed
on them and the dolls that mothers buy their girls look like slutz (spelt
with a z for good reason, figure it out for yourself). Preteen girls
aspire to be like the sleazy female “auto-tuned” unmusical
hip-hop vocal artists they see while loafing on the sofa watching music
videos on TV. Girls without their biological father don’t have
any ambitious career aspirations. They just want to be a sofa loafer
like their mother. Today’s little girls are taught to hate all
men and despise their father. Her mother prepares her to intellectually
appreciate the cerebral stimulation that day time television that entertains
her. The mother knows that if the daughter were to develop a higher
intellectual function, she may realise exactly how hypocritical and
ridiculously unjust feminism really is. There is the risk that a female
with higher intelligence, advanced numeric ability and highly developed
logic will expose her mother for what she really is. Women therefore,
promote substandard education for all. For the boys, substandard education
will assist in making them more susceptible to becoming an easy victim
of the succubus. For the girls, a substandard education will stop them
from realising how unbelievably immoral everything is that she does
to a man. Thanks to mummy, we have the perfect predators and prey.
It is the artificially elevated status of motherhood that comes from
women, attempting to compensate for their complete lack of any useful
contribution to society, that has fooled moronic politicians and judges
to encourage the abduction of children from fathers and place them at
mortal risk with the mother. Through the government sanctioned theft
of assets and income, the woman has transferred wealth to the point
where single motherhood is a highly lucrative means to deliver an affluent
life for any slovenly, idle and inanely dumb mother. Her greed and need
to keep her children dumber than she, ensures that the assets and income
that she has pocketed from the children’s father will not be spent
on educating the children.
The effect of single mothers, in sum, has been to corrode the world
with stupidity and the malicious desecration of economic resources.
She has also convinced the idiots that operate political and judiciary
systems to give her the ultimate right over life and death of children.
She is legally sanctioned to kill any foetus at will, regardless of
the fact that the foetus is made up of 50% of the father. Conversely,
the father has absolutely no say in the continuance or termination of
any pregnancy. As with all other assets, property and income –
the OWNERSHIP of every foetus is arbitrarily transferred completely
to the female.
Frivolity, irrationality, fantasy and lunacy (disguised as spiritualism):
The female is nothing but fluff, incapable of logical thought or rational
decision making. Her total lack of reasoning comes from the self-serving
attributes that motivate and drive her behaviour. Her earliest experiences
are with her own mother who used vanity and greed to exploit all around
her. Throughout her life she refines her hunting techniques to the point
where she begins to emotionally blackmail and manipulate her own victims.
She is not equipped to understand what she is doing she just knows that
it works.
Her greatest need is to compensate for her own useless existence. Her
mother has ensured that she can only survive by exploiting others so
she will immediately go to work on using others to attempt to become
something from nothing. She masters the weapons in her arsenal and men
find her intellectual weakness and lunacy appealing; much like a child
enjoys a pet. She then goes in for the kill using her body to manipulate
the man into satisfying her vanity and greed.
The male’s logic and sense of justice, of which she is acutely
aware but cannot comprehend, frightens her. She knows that honesty and
justice could obstruct her immoral, government assisted theft of assets
and income. Male spiritualism is not like the females lunacy. Male spiritualism
is based on the inner peace derived from being fair and just, and by
doing right by others. These male attributes, combined with his intelligence
and ambition, fuels the anger she feels from her envy. She uses this
anger to justify her larcenous behaviour, continually trying to convince
herself, her children, friends and relatives that she deserves the assets
and income that she strips from men. She muses about being at one with
the universe and places herself on a higher spiritual plane than men.
It is all just a dream, a fantasy in which she dwells because she know
that she offers nothing of value to the real world.
Physical attraction and the female form: Functioning purely as collector
of the outcome of a man’s achievements and lacking any ability
that can be uniquely attributable to her other than the ability to incubate
a foetus, females differ from each other only in their physical appearance.
It is, therefore, logical that males will be attracted to elements of
physical appearance, as all other female attributes are common to all.
It is also logical that the physical appearances most closely related
to the only useful female attribute (child bearing) will be of greatest
interest to males. Breasts and hips (hips interrelate with legs and
bums) are the only things that differentiate one woman from the next.
The male’s attraction to the physical appearance of females is
not based on reducing females to anything less than what they really
are. If females were primarily differentiated in their intellect, skills,
work performance, self-confidence, physical strength or sense of humour
then males would be attracted to those attributes. It is therefore quite
logical for men to place greater emphasis on physical appearance when
selecting a female.
The attributes that a woman looks for in her male victims are much
more diverse because there is much more to differentiate males. Of all
the diversity that contributes to the identity of the male, females
are predominantly attracted to those attributes that are most closely
related to his capacity to accumulate wealth, which she can steal from
him. The exception to this is when the male already possesses wealth.
If a man already has substantial assets then the assets alone will be
enough to attract the female regardless of the male’s physical
or psychological attributes. This means that she will run to the bed
of the oldest and ugliest wealthy man imaginable as she will be able
to use her court system to transfer everything he has to her. If he
is ugly, she’ll get rid of him through divorce; if he is old,
she will drive him to his grave. Either way, she will take it all and
convince everyone that she deserves it all and will blame him for the
divorce or his own death. In her time of mourning she will take advantage
of the situation and have all around her giving her the attention that
she continually craves to validate her worthless existence while playing
the perennial victim.
She attaches words like nurturing, accepting and caring to her maternal
nature as if they are attributes exclusively available to females. She
knows that these traits are not exclusively female but has claimed right
to those attributes. Men display these characteristics altruistically
while the woman uses them as weapons. Still dissatisfied with her own
lack of value to society, she continues to expand her claim over masculine
traits to the point where she believes that she will self-sacrifice
to protect her children. Her acts of killing her own children as a means
to achieve her selfish ends prove the contrary. She will, in fact, sacrifice
her children to protect herself.
The female’s only unique value to society as a bearer of children
causes her to define her own existence purely in maternal terms. Even
without children of her own she will fake the display of maternal behaviours
toward other children.
On the matter of privacy: There are male matters that men hold private
and there are female matters that don’t interest men. This is
clearly the case as men have had no desire whatsoever to gain membership
to any female organisation while women have fought tooth and nail to
gain access to every male club, society and organisation. She is too
stupid to realise why men have not wanted to gain access to any female
orientated organisation. Her need to be the centre of attention drives
her to insist on a man showing an interest in her pedestrian conversation.
Males know that a female is incapable of comprehending much of what
interests him and he has the decency to spare confusing her with discussing
such matters. The greedy female, however, must have access to everything
he possesses. She hates it when she doesn’t know what he is doing.
She will say that she is curious or interested to make excuses for her
greed and envy, she will not allow a man privacy. Once she gains access
to a male club, society, gym or other organisation, she immediately
changes it to suit her own vacuous needs. She makes the changes because
she cannot cope with the intellectual and moral standards of the organisation.
There may be times when a man might voluntarily converse with a female.
However, any conversational interest that a male may have with a female
is based on a search for some modicum of female differentiation beyond
her physical appearance. This is an ongoing and largely unsatisfied
quest for the man.
In her greedy quest to obtain everything male that is driven by her
envy, she wants to spend time with men. While doing so, she is preoccupied
with what she can gain from any interaction with any male. In any ongoing
relationship she will reach a point when she realises that she cannot
take the man’s intellect, skills, work performance, self-confidence,
physical strength, sense of humour or any other intrinsically male trait.
It is at this time she will destroy the relationship. It might only
take several days or weeks; for some it may take many years. Historically,
she would stay with the man because she lacks the willingness and ability
to earn her keep in society. Her anger and frustration has driven her
to convince gullible politicians and homosexual men to engineer the
social change that enables her to destroy the relationship and unscrupulously
keep all assets while receiving continuing income. The male is completely
blameless and because he has done nothing to deserve having everything
that he has worked for taken from him, he is confused by her irrational
behaviour. His sense of justice and fair play make it difficult to understand
her insatiable greed.
The Destruction of Family and Community: Our society is not a community,
but merely a collection of single mother families and devastated dads.
The concept of family and community has been destroyed by the female’s
selfishness. Upon ripping her children’s family apart, she seeks
to completely alienate the father to eliminate his protection that will
interfere with damage that she is compelled to inflict on her children.
She abducts the children; uprooting them from their patriarchal extended
family, school and friends. She needs to escape any small community
that has witnessed her greed and cruelty. She needs to find a new hunting
ground where her future victims are unaware of her immoral behaviour.
She finds new people to exploit and will spin her accounts of the past,
casting all blame on the father of her children. The process has been
repeated countless times to the point where she has fractured every
community in Western society. Her inability and unwillingness to allow
her children to adopt any noble male characteristics relating to justice,
law, order, self-control, discipline or respect has led her children
to turn feral. They have no respect for property or other people and
will act impulsively, driven by the greed that they have learned from
their mother. Because her true usefulness to children ends at the time
the children are weaned, she has conveniently attributed her lack of
parenting skills to a variety of medical conditions. She does this so
that her children become the problem rather than taking responsibility
for being a useless parent. The most popular excuses she uses to deflect
blame include Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD), Conduct Disorder
(CD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Women have
outlawed childhood discipline because discipline, particularly self-discipline,
is a masculine attribute. Order and self-discipline lead to higher academic
achievement that threatens her tenuous grip on hiding her own inadequacies
and unscrupulous behaviour. Her inability and unwillingness to teach
self-discipline is covered up by her newly invented medical conditions.
The female’s vanity, greed and envy have destroyed other elements
of society as she pushes these attributes to become societal norms.
Her success in this endeavour is evidenced through “Reality TV”.
These programs would never exist in a society that values fairness,
justice and equity. However, in a society that values female vanity
greed and envy such programs will rate well. Feminism has made these
negative attributes societal norms and Reality TV now rewards those
attributes with celebrity and a million dollars to fuel the greed. Every
deviously nefarious act, motivated by female values, performed by any
show participant (male or female) is generously rewarded. The show producers
pitch the programme to dim witted women and the undereducated children
of the second generation single mothers. The “dumbed down”
children can’t get enough of the televised evil. Ignoring the
needs for discipline, she allows even the youngest child to watch these
television programs despite ratings systems warning against it.
The intelligent female (?): The more intelligent woman’s reliance
on her vanity, greed and envy to survive is not as strong as the average
woman’s. She is excited about the possibility of independently
gaining material wealth rather than having to steal it from a man. She
will still use her sexuality in negotiations and will use a man’s
sense of justice and protective instincts against him. Unfortunately,
her position in society is largely artificial. The mandatory university
placements, study assistance and special assessment methods reserved
exclusively for females has diluted her real status and places society
at risk. The female surgeon operating on a child may only have that
qualification because she was guaranteed her training and qualification
because she is female. Affirmative action is dangerous but it contributes
to the feminist objective to “dumb down” society.
Better qualified men are denied positions in education and employment
in order to maintain arbitrary quotas. Such positions are going to a
lesser qualified, inexperienced and incapable females. This sexual discrimination
has been renamed to sound like something positive. “Affirmative
Action” sounds so much better than sexual discrimination. If a
man receives something that a woman does not deserve, it is called sexual
discrimination. If a woman receives something that she does not deserve
it is called “affirmative action”. She uses her manipulation
of words (femispeak or political correctness) to justify her greed and
disguise her inadequacies. She even gives feminist “newspeak”
a title that sounds quite palatable – political correctness. She
implies that the English language before feminism was somehow incorrect.
Her influence over all aspects of the education system is designed
to lower the bar to a level where her own lack of intelligence disappears.
The intelligent female is therefore now just a myth. She only exists
due affirmative action. In today’s society, there is no way of
knowing if a woman might be truly intelligent because she has probably
just used another feminist fantasy to mislead society. Until we eliminate
discrimination and bring back intelligence tests that truly correlate
with general ability in our very real, mechanically driven time and
space based universe, we must assume that there is no such thing as
the truly intelligent woman.
The independently successful woman babbles on about her knowledge,
skill and ability, but she has no understanding of how to appropriately
use such attributes more than any other woman. She will use knowledge,
skill and ability to manipulate others, to reverse her envy and to ultimately
feed her greed. A woman will only acquire some knowledge, skill and
productive ability to compensate for a lack of the attributes associated
with her primary function; bearing children. When her physical attributes
associated with bearing children and attracting men are lacking, the
female will seek knowledge, skill and ability to compensate. This phenomenon
explains the “bimbo”. The stronger the physical characteristics
associated with child bearing, the more attractive she will be to a
male which results in her placing a greater reliance on her looks to
acquire material gain from a male. The weaker the physical characteristics
associated with child bearing, the less attractive she will be to a
male which results in a lower likelihood of acquiring material gain
from the male. The woman’s inherent sloth leads her to use of
her physical appearance as the preferred option for acquiring wealth.
The added bonus of using her physical appearance is that it also feeds
her vanity. The use of knowledge, skill and productive abilities are
a fall back position that will only be utilised if she believes her
physical appearance will not secure sufficient material gain from a
man. Her demand for products and services such as make-up, hair styling
and cosmetic surgery to improve her physical appearance, delivers proof
of her preference to use her looks to acquire and control capital.
Social disobedience: Although she claims to value community she has
destroyed all the rules that underpin a fair, just and safe community.
She makes her own lack of discipline “normal” by removing
order from society. Stripping away communal values of fairness and decency,
she has built a society based on her all-important selfishness, vanity
and greed. This has resulted in a society focussed on ends regardless
of the means to achieve those ends.
She has immorally gained illegitimate access to positions that have
put her into roles that she cannot perform. Her vengefulness and spite
make it impossible for her to function in any position relating to justice.
She is the perfect lawyer as she knows how to distort the rules to suit
herself, but she knows nothing of justice. As a judge she cannot dispense
justice dispassionately. Her improper use of artificial admission to
positions of power has resulted in the sexist laws that she uses to
emasculate all men. She cannot be trusted in any position of power.
Authority and Government: Having no sense of fairness or justice and
fuelled by her greed, she steals authority and demands respect rather
than earning them. Her insatiable need to acquire and control capital
while contributing nothing, will see her rise to high levels within
government. She seeks to criticise and ultimately replace all masculine
authorities as she is threatened by the justice upon which those authorities
were originally based. By imitating the natural authority of men she
hopes to gain respect. But any society based on fairness, justice and
equity will easily identify her ulterior motives. She uses her imitation
of a man to claim ownership of his strong and unwavering sense of justice
and his inherent role as protector. She has used her feminist clap trap
to ensure that all authorities kowtow to her ruthless greed.
She removes the role of competition from society so that her inability
to compete does not handicap her hijacking of authority and control
of capital.
Philosophy, Religion, and Morality Based on Sex: The male's sense of
justice and morality are designed to protect society from greed and
envy. These ethical and moral safeguards are interrelated with classical
philosophy and religion. Being hamstrung by ethics and morals, the woman
seeks to undermine all methods of societal protection based on the guidance
and control offered by ethics and religion. Moreover, feminist philosophy
seeks to destroy such controls to make any immoral act socially acceptable.
If Plato were a woman there would be no “Republic”. The
basis of salvation through abiding by a moral code is to promote all
members of a society treating others in a fair and just manner. The
female has sought to destroy happiness on this earth by creating a society
that is stupid, immoral, unethical and outright dangerous for those
who cannot immorally defend themselves.
She knows that she cannot enter heaven due to her evil nature and vindictive
envy. This has led her to create hell on earth.
Prejudice (racial, ethnic, religious, etc): The female needs scapegoats
onto whom he can project her failings and inadequacies and upon whom
she can vent her frustration at not contributing anything other than
her gestation ability to society. She has used her ‘shit house
rat’ cunning, to re-label her own racial, ethnic, religious and
sexual discrimination as “political correctness” and “affirmative
action”. She uses these machinations to undermine everything that
might get in her way of stealing power and capital from men. She is
demeaning to others in the extreme suggesting that some people need
to have everyone else handicapped in order to achieve. This strategy
further lowers competitive performance in society thus improving her
relative abilities. Her handicapping of society comes at an enormous
cost as she insists that those who she “helped” are expected
to adopt and promote her feminist fantasy ideals. She has manipulated
minority groups into believing that her ideals are designed to help
members of those groups. She uses them as her puppets to promote her
selfish social experiment. The primary victims of this manipulation
are homosexual men. Valerie Solanis made it quite clear that homosexual
men are the perfect puppet for feminism in her S.C.U.M. Manifesto.
Competition, Prestige, Status, Formal Education, Ignorance and Social
and Economic Classes: Her inability to compete in the real world causes
the woman to construct her own society where competition, knowledge
and skill don’t exist. If her fantasy world existed 500,000 years
ago we would still be living in caves today. She pretends that she possess
knowledge and ideas but directs these inwardly. This is very convenient
for her because with no outward expression of such knowledge and ideas,
we have to take her word for it that they exist.
She loves prestige and status but does not want to have to compete
for them. She needs to have it all delivered to her as she submerges
herself in her daytime television world of feminist fantasy. As the
self-proclaimed perennial victim, she insists that higher education
is designed to exclude people from professions rather than to educate
into such professions. Her lack of understanding of the role of competition
guarantees a continual de-evolution of quality in all professions. She
is naïve enough to think that excluding incompetent people from
professions should be outlawed. If she had her way, we could all be
qualified brain surgeons conducting surgery in caves. This is clearly
a world that could only exist in fantasy, but she works endlessly to
make such a world real.
The female clearly has a vested interest in promoting her fantasy world
based on incompetence.
Prevention of Conversation: In her need to destroy a reality that needs
competence and competition to improve society, she has assumed control
of language to promote her fantasies. As the ultimate hypocrite she
is against all forms of censorship but has removed freedom of speech
through her “politically correct” language. This control
over language has been used to make any criticism of feminism socially
unacceptable and in many instances, illegal.
Her own conversation is typically a waste of time and oxygen. She will
share embellished stories steeped in fantasy. It is almost impossible
to extract a factual account of events from her ramblings. She uses
what she has to say as a weapon to impose guilt on children, foster
envy among her peers, attack her critics, apportion blame to others
and express her paranoia through continual complaining.
She upsets all around her by not exercising any self-control over her
mouth but excuses her disgusting use of profanity as an expression of
deviant original opinion. She thinks that bitchy conversation is admirable
and promotes this to her children. Her appalling use of language make
most men feel ill.
Friendship: She uses the word love rather than companionship and friendship
to further her power over others. She has promoted an ideal that women
are much more capable of giving love and therefore love is a possession
that she can choose to give, withhold or deny. This is one of her most
powerful weapons that she uses to manipulate the behaviour of others.
If she gets what she wants she may give her “love” in return.
If she doesn’t she will withhold her “love”. If she
wants nothing to do with someone she will deny that person any of “her”
“love”.
She uses her “love” to coerce the children she wishes to
dominate and exploit, into hating their father. Her denial of love gives
her the legal right to strip a man of his assets and income. The moment
she states that she no longer “loves” a man with whom she
has had some ongoing relationship; she has government sanctioned power
to have the man evicted from his own home and her courts and judges
will subsequently transfer his assets and income to her.
When it comes to friendship she will have more friends than a male.
She needs a larger number of social peers to hedge her bets when it
comes to vanity. With only one friend, she has limited opportunity to
see herself as superior across multiple points of comparison. By having
more friends, she can select a variety of people where she can be superior
using one particular point of reference or another. There will be one
friend who will have less wealth than her, one who is less attractive,
one with a man who earns less than the one she is exploiting, one who
is not as clever, etc. This phenomenon explains why single women will
have friends who are single; those with children will have friends with
children, etc. A cursory observation reveals that when a woman couples
with a man she will associate with other women who are “coupled”,
when she has children she will move into a social circle with others
who have children. It is due to her envy and lack of self-worth that
she needs these “friendships”. Her friendships with other
women serve no purpose beyond social comparison. When the social comparison
becomes unfavourable, her friend immediately becomes a bitch and the
social bond is broken and her “love” for that friend is
withdrawn until the social comparison becomes favourable or she will
deny the friend her love. She will alter her circle of friends to make
sure that her social comparisons are based on similar social circumstances.
This explains the single-mother power-lunches that can be witnessed
at shopping malls on welfare payment days.
Sexuality: She uses her sexuality and sex as a weapon and source of
income. She uses it to reward herself and to punish others. It is the
only intrinsic capital that she possesses so it is the only method at
her disposal to gain what she wants. She lacks the passion to experience
lust. Her attraction is based purely on what capital she can gain from
any physical contact with a man. She may articulate an attraction to
a male based on the man’s appearance but she will find a man with
similar physical features infinitely more attractive if his appearance
is backed by a higher income and/or greater material wealth. Her lack
of passion and subsequent inability to experience true lust makes her
a cold and unfeeling agent in any relationship. This gives her the freedom
to focus purely on how she can achieve material gain from the relationship
without any sense of guilt, remorse or empathy for her victims.
Masculinity: She has effectively made masculinity illegal for men and
socially desirable for women. A man who acts like a man runs the risk
of being charged with criminal offences or sued under common law. Volumes
of legislation and case law now exist to ensure that men will be punished
for any display of masculinity. As the perpetual victim, she has constructed
a fantasy where any man who is caught evaluating a woman for the only
unique attributes she possesses (physical attractiveness) is guilty
of being sexist. In this same fantasy world, a woman who evaluates a
man on his physical appearance (or bank balance), is deemed to be some
sort of heroine.
She has also conspired with her “dumbed down” homosexual
academics to hold themselves out as some sort of expert in masculinity.
These gender misfits are attempting to reconstruct masculinity into
something that women can more easily kick around. They ramble on about
men having to change to fit with their “interpretation”
of what masculinity should be. Get a grip on reality! Men are the way
they are through more than 500,000 years of adaptation to survive on
this planet and to protect the survival of the species by stopping the
greedy female from ruining society. What will happen to society if men
adopt the feminist’s idea of masculinity? We refuse to change
so deal with it!
In today’s screwed up feminist society, each of the following
masculine attributes have been deemed as being negative for men and
positive for women. For example, independence in a man is now viewed
as a weakness but for a female, independence is considered a strength.
Independent, assertive, aggressive, protective, witty, disciplined,
virile, strong, brave, hard working, ambitious, competitive, stoic,
objective, intellectual, rational, scientific, practical, mechanical,
dogmatic, dominating, individualistic, demanding, proud, decisive and
adventurous are all now viewed as being negative attributes for men
whilst being touted as positive attributes for women. In fact, a woman
who mimics masculine attributes is considered “strong”.
The female’s hypocrisy and lack of rational thought is, once again,
clearly demonstrated by this trend. She does not realise that by promoting
these attributes in women and demonising them in men, she has show just
how stupid and dishonest she really is. If such attributes are a sign
of strength in women, then men must logically be inherently strong.
In early schooling boys are discouraged or punished if they display
any of these behaviours while girls are rewarded. Just imagine how confusing
this is for boys.
A Better Future
The pinnacle of feminist stupidity is the woman’s desire to
be freed of the role of mother and housekeeper while implementing a
system by which women are financially encouraged to produce children
thus enabling them to sit at home and perform “home duties”,
like spreading out on the sofa to soak up daytime television dribble.
We live in a society where women aspire to finding sperm donors, spitting
out children and then asset stripping the sperm donors so she can feed
off the labour of others. How liberating! This is, without doubt, the
most comical aspect of feminism.
There is however, promise for the future. There are men who now recognise
that chivalry should only be applied to women who behave like women.
These men know that the women in the world who want to mimic men should
be treated like men. Despite their hatred of competition, these women
have now engineered a society where men must fight to return justice
and equality to all. Now that women no longer behave like women, men
will fight them. The gloves are off!
It has become clearly apparent that men must shut down feminism and
implement some control over the woman’s negative impacts that
have destroyed society. Men know that women can contribute nothing meaningful
or worthwhile to society beyond the gestation of foetuses and wet nursing.
It is clear to men that women only use the products of male labour (including
inventions, literature, philosophy and art) to satisfy their greed.
Women have made it very clear that they cannot be trusted in any position
of authority. This is particularly true of every woman in education
where she has deliberately slowed the advancement of society. Men now
know that women cannot be trusted to read any academic literature as
they are not equipped to understand how the information should be used
to better society. Men have seen how women have taken the work of men
and twisted it to suit her nefarious objectives. For example, men know
how she has twisted the work of Marx to feather her own nest.
There is now a movement to fight male oppression and destroy the feminist
culture that has delivered immeasurable harm to society. There are men
that will now do whatever it takes to remove feminist fantasies from
society. These men are members of S.C.R.U.F.F. the Society for Cutting
and Ripping Up Feminist Fantasies. Any man who knows how to behave like
a real man is a SCRUFF.
Men who have what it takes to be independent, assertive, aggressive,
protective, witty, disciplined, virile, strong, brave, hard working,
ambitious, competitive, stoic, objective, intellectual, rational, scientific,
practical, mechanical, dogmatic, dominating, individualistic, demanding,
proud, decisive and adventurous are SCRUFFs. These men see straight
through the fantasy world created by feminists and recognise the realities
required for a functional society.
Unimpeded by vanity, greed, injustice and stupidity, SCRUFFs celebrate
masculinity and will use it to break apart the feminist’s dysfunctional
social experimentation. Despite feminism’s pressure on public
opinion, SCRUFFs have resisted being the sensitive new age guy or metrosexual
pansy. SCRUFFs have the guts and determination to ignore femispeak and
tell it like it is.
The days of SCUM are over; it’s time for the REAL show to begin.
SCRUFFs have a lot of damage to repair, it won’t be easy but masculine
intelligence and ability will return the justice and morality required
to protect society from the evil that now prevails from the lunacy of
feminism.
Adventure and Competition: Women have made life unadventurous. There
is now no reason to excel or strive to better oneself. Everyone wins
and everyone gets the prize; therefore nobody wins or loses and we have
a generation of ignorant dreamers in fairy land that aspire to mediocrity
while expecting unfounded greatness. SCRUFFs will return competition
and adventure to life in a way that prepares people for a real and vital
life.
Secrecy, Censorship, Suppression of Knowledge and Ideas, and Exposés:
Every female's deep-seated, secret, most hideous fear is of being exposed
as an incompetent dullard. She fakes niceness, politeness and 'dignity'
to hide her nefarious motives to drag society down to her own level.
In order to achieve her ends, the female must resort to:
- Censorship. The feminist ideal to remove censorship has become selective
censorship. She allows any negative message that promotes selfishness
and vanity to be freely published and distributed whilst attacking
and banning any responsible message that promotes ethical, family
and community values. She has removed any negative opinions of offensive
language because she associates the use of profanity as butch and
thinks that by using that language she is in some way more masculine.
She has allowed such language to be acceptable in kindergartens and
school playgrounds. She is offended when a male uses profanities but
applauds the woman who cannot complete a sentence without at least
one expletive word.
- Suppression of all ideas and knowledge that might expose her or
threaten her faux dominant position in 'society'. Much social data
are suppressed, because it is proof of the female's gross dishonesty.
She hides empirical data that clearly show that; women are equally
guilty of domestic violence, lesbians engage in domestic violence,
children are at a greater risk of harm from their mother than their
biological father, fatherlessness leads to high levels of delinquency
in children and men are more intelligent than women. All of these
have been proven in peer reviewed, empirical research but has been
suppressed by feminists and their puppets. She also suppresses any
research that exposes her use of mental illness as an excuse for killing
and maiming children and men. She has done the same with any research
that exposes her use of new childhood mental illnesses that excuse
her poor parenting and the resulting lack of discipline in society.
Feminism seeks to blame men for mental illness just as it seeks to
blame everything on anything other that the woman. Men don’t
blame women for mental illness. Men have the intelligence to see that
women use the “label” of mental illness to disguise their
own failure. Men, therefore, know how to cure these illnesses rather
than merely treating them with drugs. The cure is simple, remove feminism
and end female involvement with children once they are weaned.
- Discrediting exposés. The female's greatest threat in life
is to be exposed for what she is. Women despise exposés because
they know that well presented facts will destroy the feminist myth.
She fears the attention it will draw to her inadequacies and the methods
she uses to hide them. She will use pseudo research (advocacy research)
to discredit exposés that show her for what she is.
Incapable of a positive contribution to society (which is the only
thing that can justify one's worthwhile existence), the female is, at
best, lazy, ineffectual and incompetent. She is not easily bored as
the most asinine event will entertain her. Much of what entertains her
is dished up during daytime television and the most pedestrian attempts
at creative literature delivered in women’s magazines. Her dulling
effect on children has increased the popularity of all mindless forms
of entertainment.
She absorbs all around her, assuming ownership of all without contributing
any physical or intellectual effort. She is the ultimate parasite and
her own children are included in her hosts. She is therefore, ethically
not entitled to exist in a working and thinking society. She must be
shown that her numbers can be controlled!
A person who contributes to the welfare and protection of all others
has a greater right to exist than any person who exploits others, especially
their own children. It is, therefore, logical that men have a greater
right to exist than women. Men, therefore, have the right and responsibility
to control the existence of women!
Men have contributed more to advances in society while women have merely
consumed and exploited those advances. Women have never made any significant
contribution to science, engineering, technology, defence, art or music.
She has exploited all of these to further her own cause and elevate
her status to a point that far exceeds her contribution. The feminist
has used the printing press, radio, television, telecommunications technology
and computer technology to spread her poison without crediting the intelligence
and expertise of the men who have made all of this available to her.
Such acts of theft and misappropriation must be made obvious for all
to see. She has taken ownership of institutions (e.g., governments and
universities) developed by men. She uses those institutions to indoctrinate
the dumbed down, unsuspecting and trusting society into her fantasy
world of deception.
Much of the damage that she has caused to society is now self-evident
and the beginning of the end of her reign of terror is upon us. Escalating
crime rates, juvenile delinquency, lack of justice and the drop in intellectual
ability are now obvious and it is the responsibility of every SCRUFF
to repair more than 30 years of the feminist’s destructive influence.
SCRUFFs will take the lead by ceasing to engage in any transactional
activity with women beyond sexual interaction.
SCRUFFs will undermine the position of women in the labour force by
refusing to obtain goods or services from any female owned/operated
business or any female service provider. All complaints regarding any
transaction with an organisation will attribute the blame exclusively
to females working within that organisation.
SCRUFFs will deny all women access to sperm as women cannot be trusted
to not misuse it and unethically commence a pregnancy that she will
use to strip assets and income from men.
SCRUFFs will store their sperm prior to having a vasectomy.
SCRUFFs will destroy sperm carrying the X chromosome for 5 years as
a clear demonstration of control over the number of women in the population.
SCRUFFs will limit the role of women in society to that which their
contribution is unique, the gestation and nursing of children as well
as meeting the sexual needs of men.
SCRUFFs will use surrogates to gestate and nurse children. They will
ensure that the surrogacy agreement removes all parenting rights from
the woman performing the gestation and/or the egg donor. Where necessary,
SCRUFFs will use female relatives for this purpose to avoid any statutory
rights assigned to women.
SCRUFFs will continue an ongoing public awareness program to disseminate
valid, empirical data that prove the lack of any positive contribution
of females to society.
SCRUFFs will celebrate all aspects of masculinity. Their independence
frees them from the need to risk their assets and income by engaging
in any long term relationship with a woman.
SCRUFFs will return the teaching of justice, equity and discipline
to children. They will also elevate the literacy and numeracy skills
in society thus improving productivity and a sense of worth for all.
Ultimately, as the intelligence of society is increased, people will
be able to clearly understand the damage caused by women’s insane
attempts to imitate men. Society will clearly see through the feminist
myth.
Once feminism is eradicated, SCRUFFs will allow the proportion of females
in society to climb to 66%. Appropriate legislative changes must be
made to control the impacts of the female’s sloth and greed by
ending the asset stripping of men. Prior to allowing the proportion
of women in the population to exceed 50%, legislation will be enacted
that immediately gives full custody of all children to the father, thus
ensuring the intellectual and moral wellbeing of future generations.
Unlike the lunacy of Valerie Solanis, that seeks to wipe out men, SCRUFFs
know that to maintain masculinity there is a need to have sufficient
females in the population to entertain and gratify the needs of men.
This will be the ultimate celebration of masculinity.
There is the opportunity for men to exercise even greater control over
the breeding of women. Rather than merely controlling the number of
women in society, selective breeding offers the opportunity to alter
the appearance of women to meet the needs of men. Men have successfully
bred dogs in a way that alters their physical appearance. The same principles
can be applied to women. Selective breeding will enable SCRUFFs to breed
out any risk of future attempts at feminism. As females become more
physically attractive, they will be less likely to attempt to think
or pretend to be masculine.
Solanis promoted the annihilation of all men which exposed her desire
to be male as she considered herself to be the replacement for men.
SCRUFFs know that men cannot celebrate masculinity if they are homosexual.
The homosexual male deludes himself into believing that he is masculine
but his so-called masculinity is the feminist’s neo male that
is clearly more feminine than masculine. The homosexual male has a strong
tendency to display the negative attributes of females, particularly
vanity and envy. The homosexual male has been the perfect puppet of
feminism and has been exploited by women by through their attempt to
attach some male credibility to their idiotic ideology. SCRUFFs are
not interested in controlling the influence of homosexual men on society
as once feminism is eliminated the homosexual male will have minimal
impact on the community. It is quite feasible that the return of masculinity
will make homosexuality less fashionable or trendy. True masculinity
inspires young men to be real men. When feminism effectively outlawed
masculinity and removed all male role models, boys no longer became
men. Feminism has caused boys to mimic women. The word gay must never
be used to describe homosexual men it is just another example of a dysfunctional
minority hijacking the English language. The word gay means happy or
joyous; nothing else.
SCRUFFs are highly concerned about the closet homosexual males in governments
and the legal system who endorse and support feminism. There is little
doubt that all male politicians that deny their masculinity by supporting
feminism are homosexual. This goes all the way to the top of every feminist
controlled government and court. Current male Presidents, Prime Ministers,
judges and senior ministers that support feminism are, without doubt,
closet homosexuals living in denial. Those who are married to women,
are merely creating the illusion that they are straight, family men.
Nothing could be further from the truth; they all kowtow to feminists
as all well behaved homosexual males do.
By removing the fraudulent dominance of feminism in society, a natural
social evolution will occur that will return justice, equity, self-respect
and discipline. SCRUFFs are the catalyst of change. SCRUFFs will remove
feminism and to free up the natural return of a safer and equitable
society administered by real men.
The waiting is over. SCRUFFs will eliminate feminism overnight by harvesting
sperm, denying women access to sperm and eliminating all sperm carrying
the X chromosome for 5 years. Due to its lack of intelligent and rational
thinking, feminism overlooked the simple fact that men control the sex
of children. Such stupidity should not be allowed to exist in modern
society. Sperm determines the sex of the child; men own the sperm so
men ultimately own the proportion of each sex in the population. Valerie
Solanis was too moronic to realise this and today’s feminists
are much more mentally inept than Solanis through believing her idiotic
beliefs 30 years after she scribed her masturbation induced fantasies.
By eliminating all sperm carrying the X chromosome, SCRUFFs will demonstrate
that women have no power whatsoever in the gender war that they initiated.
SCRUFFs will use their control over the distribution of sperm to control
all aspects of the size and makeup of the population.
The planned initial jump in the proportion of men will be used to vote
every female and homosexual male (feminist sympathiser) from political
office. SCRUFFs will completely eliminate all signs of feminism in 23
years which is 10 years less than what it took to women to cause all
the damage that we suffer today.
But SCRUFFs are impatient; SCRUFFs will start the process by undermining
every female in the labour market. Additional measures to disrupt the
feminist controlled economies have already commenced. SCRUFFs are currently
leaving the labour market and have been engaging in protest activities
to disrupt the economy. Deliberate disruptions to morning peak hour
traffic causing thousands to be late for work are costing the global
economy billions each year. Nearly every breakdown in morning CBD peak
hour traffic is caused by a SCRUFF intentionally causing thousands of
workers to be late for work. SCRUFFs will increase this and other activities
that disrupt the economy until we start seeing women removed from the
labour market. SCRUFFs now refuse to deal with any employed woman as
her place in the labour market is fraudulent. For example, SCRUFFs won’t
let a female doctor near them or their children as they know that she
has only gained her qualifications through feminism’s “affirmative
action”.
When all men simply refuse to have anything to do with women beyond
short term companionship, the economy will flourish. Men will keep their
assets and income which will be more sensibly allocated rather than
being wasted on the shopping channel, shoes and mobile telephone texting.
SCRUFFs’ assets are safe because they deny women access to their
sperm and have already eliminated sperm carrying the X chromosome.
There is no “real” conflict as SCRUFFs will end the gender
war by simply being SCRUFFs!
It is going to take some time to de-brainwash millions of gullible
people who have been dumbed down into believing that feminism is somehow
altruistic in its ideals. SCRUFFs don’t wait for that to happen,
they make it happen!
While SCUM (feminism) ideology promotes destroying property and using
murder to control the proportion of males in the population, SCRUFFs
promote building property and using their rightful ownership of sperm
to control feminist lunacy in the female population. SCRUFFs promote
prosperity.
SCRUFFs will take over the airwaves and eliminate all programs and
advertising that negatively portray men and fathers. As the female population
reduces there will be no need to pander to the mindless female viewer.
Once the natural order is restored, all prime-time media will deliver
intellectually stimulating and witty content that is wasted on the female
audience. Current affairs programs will explore and investigate important
and meaningful events rather than promote the latest diet or fashion
fads. Any research reported in the media will need to be properly validated
and subjected to peer review.
SCRUFFs would have liked to promote the value of two parent families
but women have proven that they cannot be trusted as a matriarch of
a family. All women will therefore be permanently excluded from any
matriarchal roles until their gender identity confusion is bred out.
There will be no Women’s Auxiliary of SCRUFF. SCRUFFs know that
many women support the notion of men being men. However, women have
clearly demonstrated that they cannot be trusted to act in anyone’s
favour other than their own. Any woman who believes that the SCRUFF
Manifesto is too harsh must be reminded that the actions of women has
prompted the need for SCRUFFs and their manifesto so they must direct
any complaint about the SCRUFF Manifesto to the cretins in society who
support feminism.
The most obnoxious and harmful people that must be removed from their
current roles are: single mothers, lawyers, female judges, homosexual
male judges, female politicians and all who are in their service, lecturers
in female studies, all female “academics” (pseudo-academics),
female teachers, female police officers, female self-titled comedians,
homosexual male comedy writers, all women in the media, melismating
hip-hop and R&B singers, women in the defence forces, all females
in the scouting movement, all females occupying employment that could
be fulfilled by a man (all jobs except prostitutes, foetus incubators
and wet nurses). SCRUFFs will undermine everybody acting in these roles
to ensure that they are quickly removed from the labour market.
SCRUFFs will not picket, demonstrate, march, strike or complain. Doing
so is a complete waste of time and energy. These “politically
correct” activities are for those who have been beaten into submission
by feminism. SCRUFFs take real and meaningful action to undermine every
female position in the economy. SCRUFFs refuse to deal with women in
the workplace in any way other than to complain about their incompetence.
SCRUFFs deny women the opportunity to steal assets by denying them access
to sperm and by avoiding any relationship that lasts more than 3 months.
SCRUFFs will only use “politically correct” activities that
cause massive losses to feminist controlled economies. Feminism has
control in any economy that uses laws or institutes to strip assets
and income from men. Until child support laws and institutions are disbanded
by governments, and children are handed over to their father, SCRUFFs
will cause maximum disruption to that economy!
SCRUFFs don’t need to break the law. SCRUFFs will eliminate feminism
and then implement new laws that are fair and just. SCRUFFs laws will
protect society by punishing evil rather than labelling it as a medical
condition and treating it with fluffy counselling. SCRUFFs will make
the laws!
There will be a transitional time where men will think they need to
cohabitate with their female companions. Once men realise the substantial
improvements in safety, productivity, creativity, intelligenc
