Women are not only sexist and ageist -- they
are also lengthist and heightist.
- Women are sexist, because they use
their majority status in electorates to set up research and other
agencies (such as ministries of Women's Affairs and Women's Studies
departments) which get paid by men's taxes to find things for women
to complain about and publicise-- and then claim that what they have
found proves that women are disadvantaged ! Any disadvantages that
men may suffer from are never discovered or publicised at taxpayer
expense -- if at all.
- Women are ageist, committing ageicide
on vast numbers of children on the ground that they are not old enough
to come out of their wombs by themselves -- they need to be aborted
(without their consent or the fathers' consent);
- Women are lengthist, apparently prefering
men with longer penises;
- Women are heightist, prefering men
who are tall over those who are short.
Women's heightism places men who are shorter than the norm for their
ethnic group at a competitive disadvantage compared to tall men. In
Western countries, where Feminism is the unacknowledged State Ideology,
short men feel more pressure than tall men to adopt Feminist myths,
in order to be able to attract a female partner.
All men feel this pressure, however, which is part of the reason why
so many Western men marry Third World women. The other reason, of course,
is that Feminist (i.e. Western) women are so much less feminine, on
the whole. On the whole, however, young Westerners have never known
anything different, so they have been socialised to Feminism. Heterosexuality
is defined in terms of men liking dominant, Feminist women. Any man
who sees that the Empress has no clothes, so to speak, is looked down
upon by these subservient New Age Men.
I first became aware of this phenomenon when waiting in a corridor
in Parliament to give a submission to a Select Committee on an issue
involving Domestic Violence. I saw a group of the most short-and-ugly
people that I have ever seen -- a group where the females were obviously
dominant man-haters, and the males were grovelling around them in an
obviously constant state of apology for being males. It was clear that
this group had bought Lesbian Feminist man-hating theory hook, line
and sinker.
This was my first experience of the Runt-Dyke Nexus -- but a glance
at senior personnel in the New Zealand parliamentary Labour Party results
in a feeling of deja-vu. Certainly, the runts are there, but whether
the dykes are also there depends on what rumours you believe.
Another group of relatively short men is to be found in the legal profession.
It is no coincidence, I belive, that the legal profession has also --
mindlessly and undemocratically -- adopted Feminism as its institutional
ideology.
