Peter,
I read your article posted at boysnws1.html
with interest. I share your concerns. The pendulum has swung far too
far and is causing serious harm to society as a whole, not just to boys
and men.
I see this gender imbalance in science also. Once, with a very few
notable exceptions, science was a male domain. In recent times most
of the young scientists seeking employment and subsequently recruited
by my organization have been female. The women have been correctly appointed
on merit. Few if any are overt feminists.
What has turned boys from science and academic achievement? Undoubtedly,
when I was in school in the 1950's/60's, education was designed for
the stereotypical boy and it suited him well. Others were much less
well catered for. In cities with several secondary schools it should
not be hard to provide different types of education to suit the different
needs.
A nephew was able to chose his own school. His decision was a considered
one - his parents were not being negligent - he chose Boys High, a traditional
boys school, and has thrived.
The enormous number of school stand downs and suspensions is a major
scandal. Why is nobody concerned? If a child is having trouble at school
how are they helped by throwing them out? It gives the school a respite
but at what future cost? Imagine the fuss if it were to be reported
there had been 18,000 canings rather than 18,000 suspensions in a year.
I suggest that suspensions are ineffective as a deterrent and that they
have no possibility of reformative value unless coupled with extensive
continuing counseling of the student and his family. The potential for
harm to the suspended student is very high indeed in the absence of
parental concern and such counseling.
Stopping anti-male propaganda is likely to be much more difficult.
I admire your courage in confronting it. I wish you well.
<Anonymous>
