(It is worth pointing out here that the NZEEF does not endorse all
the contents of every article on its websites -- it is enough if the
general thrust of an article is on the same wavelength as the NZEEF
for the article to be eligible for placement on an NZEEF website.)
It is cause for some optimism that people
are finally beginning to
realise that the underlying forces of the treaty industry 1
in New Zealand are no
different from those which have completely destroyed the potential of
so many other former
British / European colonies - Rhodesia / Zimbabwe for instance.
Those who have bothered to inform themselves also know that the so-called
"indigenous peoples weapon", is but one stratagem in an all-out
war
against the proper progress of civilisation.
In its modern form this largely undetected psychological war against
everything good in Western civilisation began in the mid 19th century
with the
atheistic ideologies typified by Marxism . The genuine social impulse
towards "liberty, equality, and fraternity" which
intially provoked the French Revolution was quickly usurped and transformed
into the "Great Terror", or the "class war" blood
bath by the Leftist
Jacobins . Thus the Jacobins anticipated by some sixty years the disastrous
atheistic socio / political ideology with which Marx and his followers
were to infect Western
civilisation, and very soon the entire world. . Nowadays untold millions
of Westerners are unsuspecting captives of this
socially lethal Marxist mindset. The same lack of psycho / intellectual
discernment which first led these people into psychological captivity
then transformed
them into the "useful tools" who attack everything good and
true in their civilisation
- while encouraging and promoting everything bad.
Perversely, these "holier than thou" reformists, believe
that the "sins"
of the West will somehow be redeemed by subverting the foundations of
everything
good and decent about it, everything that would lead to social progress
- and
replacing them with every conceivable form of intellectual charlatanism
and moral / ethical
degeneracy.
Thus we see that Western history since the last half of the nineteenth
century stands as testimony to the fact that this covert war's first
objective
was, ( of necessity ), the elimination of all core Western values and
religious
convictions. By the 1960's this objective - and therefore any serious
resistance to all
subsequent subversion - had largely been achieved. In short, a decisive
proportion of the Western peoples had allowed themselves to be thoroughly
indoctrinated.
If the only enemies the West, and particularly of the British Empire,
had to worry about were its external foes, it would have shrugged them
off as lion
shrugs of a mildly annoying fly. But "A house divided against itself
cannot stand"
and it has been the inner subversion that has proven the Biblical proverb
true.
The fifth column sabotage came, and continues to come from every quarter.
It
utilises every psychological means that our technological age offers,
and ranges from the most subtle and subliminal methods of earlier decades
- i.e,
propaganda, misinformation and painstakingly contrived ignorance via
a captured
education system and a largely captured news media, legislative jiggery
pokery, to
the re- writing of history and bare-faced lies of the present.
Included in all this is an aspect of the "indigenous peoples weapon"
which reveals itself in the device of engulfing former Western "Christendom"
with mass
immigration of peoples of incompatible consciousness, religion, customs,
and in some cases, values. This policy has been implemented over the
last 4-5 decades with draconian
efficiency under cover of the utopian "multi-cultural" / "diversity"
ruse - and the cleverly cultivated perception that this is one of the
endless ways that
the West must atone for its "sins".
"For all things there is a season". While a discussion of
the universal, ( not just the West's ), age-old
human impulse towards exploration, migration and colonisation, lies
outside the
purpose of this article; it is worth mentioning that it is only recently
that the
transparent lie that European colonisation is the cause of the various
catastrophes now
unfolding in Africa and other former colonies has been seriously challenged.
But at last, the truth of the matter is being clearly voiced by many
informed, free thinking commentators.
The point is well made by the journalist Mark Steyn, writing in "The
Spectator" ( August, 2003 ) - ".... The Congressional Black
Caucus blames
all this ( i.e. the bloody savagery that has increasingly engulfed Africa
since the 1960's )
on the legacy of colonialism, but it would be more accurate to call
it the
legacy of post- colonialism or prematurely terminated colonialism. The
first generation
of the continent's leaders were those London School of Economics 2
educated Afro-
Marxists who did such a great job at destroying their imperial inheritance....to
most people in Britain, colonial Africa isn't that long ago. It's only
a
little over three decades since the Queen was Sierra Leone's first post-independence
head of state. But in a land where male life- expectancy is ( nowadays
) 32, who
remembers the late sixties ?.......".
Indeed, it seems that those under the spell of the aforementioned
ideologies are perennially instrumental in dragging what properly belongs
to the future
into the present ; together with all the serious and sometimes fatal
problems
that inevitably attend any grossly premature birth.
If the deluded Socialist social engineers had permitted the evolutionary
process of mankind's racial / cultural integration to proceed in its
natural way,
and in its own time , then that which has been prematurely imposed upon
undeveloped peoples
over the last half century, ( i.e. "majority rule", "self-determination",
independence, democracy etc ), would not even have commenced untill
more
than a century from now. In this case it would have come to pass with
no more social disruption
than is normal when any kind of major change occurs in human affairs,
and certainly
without the social disasters which have characterised the last forty
years - i.e since the Left finally seized control of international Western
politics.
But, foolishly rushing in "where angels fear to tread" - is
the very least
transgression of these particular Leftist ideologues who are driven
by the
compulsion to "arrange" society according to their theories,
programmes, and
boundless egotism.
The beginnings of another wilfully designed, ( but blindly implemented
),
catastrophe are right now unfolding in many major European nations,
which have awakened to find that they have an alien, and increasingly
crime-ridden ,
unassimilated nation of millions within their borders, many of whom
openly defy their host nation's laws and traditions. These peoples are
also massively out-reproducing their hosts, and, in
the case of extremists, inciting revolution. Fifty seven percent of
births in Belgium, for example, are now Moslem.(
France is approaching the same situation ). This trend can only increase,
with the
result that in the easily foreseeable future, and failing a miraculous
and immediate
awakening, ancient European and formerly Christian countries are likely
to fall to Islam. This eventuality, in combination with the now, brilliantly
engineered,
decadence of the West, will result in a worse state of barbarism than
is typical
of many Islamic and third-world countries which, for whatever reason,
have failed to
combine the better part of Western civilisation with the better part
of
their own.
New Zealand, as much as any other Western country which follows this
same path of cultural / social suicide, will suffer the same fate. In
short,
western civilisation, ( long since global ), in its entirety may be
facing its grossly
premature demise with consequences for mankind as a whole that one shudders
to contemplate.
It lies within the nature of life itself that all civilisations are
destined to rise and then fall, having made their contribution to the
whole; but again - "for
all things there is a season". Obviously, the most certain way
to destroy a
civilisation, prematurely or otherwise, is to eliminate or corrupt the
people who
created and sustain it. Even a cursory glance at Western society today
suggests that both
tactics continue to be applied with spectacular success.
Understandably, many people nowadays point to the legendary 1960's
as the
apparent, beginning of the West's truly serious and astonishingly rapid
moral / social collapse. However, if the 1960's social phenomenon is
seen not as a beginning, but
as an end of a process, then we approach the heart of the matter.
In fact, the West's 1960's psycho / social upheaval signalled nothing
less than the successful conclusion of a largely unconscious camapaign,
( inasmuch
as most of those involved act like possessed automatons ), but certainly
undetected,
campaign against all the West's founding Christian values and traditional
institutions. Marriage, for example, and the traditional family was
always a priority
target - for obvious reasons. ( The traditional, natural, family has
always been
recognised as the foundation of civil society. ) This germinal beginnings
of this campaign really began, as already
outlined, some 100 years earlier with the mid 19th century advent of
an unprecedented
kind of thinking which found expression in an unholy alliance of secular
humanist /
Marxist type "scientific" socialism, and a materialistic distortion
of
true liberalism - ( which effectively turned it into its exact opposite.)
There is a
world of difference between the true liberal ideal and the pseudo liberalism
and
outright licence of today.
By the 1960's a decisive proportion of Western peoples had become completely
estranged from everything of their spiritual / cultural heritage which
would have guided them and their civilisation safely into the future.
The outer manifestation of this spiritual / intellectual capitulation,
was that sometime during the infamous 1960's, the West finally dropped
off the
edge of the moral precipice. The much lamented and interminably debated
social melt-down
which was the immediate result of this, still unrecognised event,
followed as surely as night must follow day. Seen against the time frame
of world
history, the West has been in moral free fall since the mid 1960's,
but when
everything is falling at the same speed, it is hard to detect.
As a result of direct, ( if semi-conscious ) actions, or dull self-centred
indifference, the Western peoples must collectively bear the greatest
culpability for this dire circumstance - ( inasmuch as their psycho
/ spiritual /
intellectual failure has allowed it to arise ).
However, if one were to distinguish between
the multiplicity of factions
which collectively comprise the West's fifth-column Left, then the main
culpability for one particularly telling blow against the future welfare
of Western
civilisation, and, by association, all civilisation - ( namely European
self-depopulation ), must surely lie with the West's Feminist movement.
It is they, ( feminist ) women no less, who far more than any other
faction, have for decades agitated, in the name of their "rights"
against their
fundamental, time honoured role and responsibility to society and its
future welfare.
Women's rights are one thing - ( like men's rights, they are simply
human rights ) but feminism is something quite different.
The feminist's "freedom" and "rights" somehow became
synonymous with a
shrewish hostility towards an essential part of their very nature and
being - namely marriage, child-bearing and motherhood . Surely there
is something
terribly wrong here.
As much as men, ( generally speaking ), have departed from the ideal
of true
manliness as a result of a century of cultural sabotage, women, ( again
in general terms ), have departed from the ideal of true womanhood much
further. Mother
Teresa tried to express this when she said -"If a mother can kill
her
unborn child, what is left ?" If the feminist's hostility towards
men, marriage and childbearing were not
enough, the demand for "control of their own bodies" has,
quite predictably,
resulted in abortion virtually on demand. Here, together with the frank
decision of many modern Western women to forego motherhood altogether,
is the main cause
of the alarming self-depopulation of Europeans throughout the world
over
the post 1950's-60's feminist era. Prior to this time the West had no
such problem. The so-called post
W.W.2 "baby boom" was really nothing more than business as
usual.
Feminist ideology however, has long since spread far beyond the confines
of
professed feminism and of sex, and today considerable numbers of normal
women, and male "feminists" add fuel to the funeral pyre of
Western
culture.
Naturally, the feminists" demand for "control of their own
bodies" never
meant controlling bodily appetites , ( the whole phenomenon was inseparable
from the"age of permissiveness" and "free love".
) What it really meant was the
control, or destruction of others bodies - i.e. infant / embryonic bodies.
Since 1967 some 6-10 million potential future citizens of the U.K have
been
aborted, most of whom - if we can presume sanity - would have had
families of their own. In New Zealand today nearly one in three pregnancies
are
terminated, which equates to approximately eighteen to twenty thousand
abortions a
year. New Zealand's appalling suicide statistics, particularly among
the young
and the elderly, are among the world's highest, and are also a tragic
phenomenon
of the post 1950's / 60's secular era.
The abortion statistics are similar in most other Western countries,
or
are leading in the same direction ; and even allowing for the case of
China, which
currently does not suffer a lack of population, ( China's birth control
policy is
more political than populist ), it is Westerners who are leading this
anti-life,
anti-human death wish. There is no room for argument on this point.
If it is true that the West
is trending towards self-depopulating, while simultaneously being inundated
with
prolifically reproducing alien immigrants, then it will die. This is
not alarmist
fear mongering - it is arithmetic. Mathematics and demographics are
exact sciences.
Extreme feminism has long advocated the destruction of what they have
labelled the "nuclear" family. All of these aims, plus those
of their kindred
subversives, together with the likely demise of Western civilisation,
have now been
largely realised. Consistent with all of the above is the fact that
feminism, ( which, of
course, originated, and is still largely confined to the West ), has
always
aligned itself with "indigenous" activism, the social agendas
of homosexual activists,
and ultra Left ideology in general. All these three movements are united
inasmuch as their imagined
interests require the overthrow or "deconstruction" of the
"establishment" - which simply
means the overthrow of our allegedly "patriarchal" Western
Judeo / Christian civil
society, its core values, ancient institutions and loyalties.
Note - While I claim that Western civilisation at its most promising
point of development was the best in the world, it would be absurd to
speak of
anything approaching perfection. I do not even claim that Western civilisation
was good, only that it was the best of its time, the hope for the future,
and that
this is precisely why it was, and continues to be attacked by those
hindering
powers and organisations which by their very nature must oppose everything
genuinely
progressive - i.e. progressive in the widest, and most profound sense.
I am assuming it to be self-evident that evil, opposing powers, call
them what you will, do not work independently into the world. They can
only wreak
their havoc via the agency of human beings.
So, while like anything else human at this point in history, Western
civilisation - even without the incessant efforts of its saboteurs -
would still be far
from perfect, it nevertheless bears within it ( or did ) the potential
for endless
improvement. In contrast, the goal, or utopian fantasy, towards which
its enemies
strive has no such potential, and has long since proven to produce nothing
but
chaos. The fact that the feminists and all others under the thrall of
the same
psycho / spiritual / "politically correct" delirium are puppets
of powerful,
shadowy "vested interests" that operate behind the scenes
of international politics and
finance - ( the true "Right wing" ), is neither excuse for
them, nor consolation
for anyone else.
In the lesbianism and Marxism which has always been a component of
radical
feminism, lies the explanation for the otherwise inexplicable phenomenon
of
women, i.e. some women - ( the nurturing, caring sex ), being in the
forefront of everything that is antipathetic to men, marriage, family,
childbearing, and
anything else genuinely feminine. The true femininity which is so
desperately needed to "balance up" modern life, appears to
be disappearing in the
West. Nor can true masculinity possibly exist except within a social
milieu of true
femininity.
Needless to say, the selfish refusal of so many hedonistic modern
Westerners of both sexes to assume the responsibility of having enough
children to replace
themselves, raise them properly, and thus ensure the future of their
civilisation for posterity's sake, is just one more poisoned fruit of
their capitulation
to the secular humanistic assault upon their priceless Christian cultural
heritage.
And let us be very clear - it is precisely Christianity, ( i.e. true
Christianity ) which is eternally the real target. The Western peoples
themselves, and the
remnants of their once incipient Christian culture are targets only
insofar as they
retain traces of such potential. ( Somewhat surprisingly, it seems that
we are still
worthy of attack, and there is some small comfort in this. )
There is nothing to be said against women having careers, but it should
be
remembered that there are such things as social responsibilities as
well
as personal ambitions, and there is only one way for children to come
into the world.
In any case, in the absence of a healthy, stable, progressive, and
essentially humanitarian society - which presupposes upcoming generations,
the
realisation of purely personal ambitions would be severely curtailed.
Third world
people by the million, and those suppressed under non-democratic totalitarian
regimes
understand this very well. With regard to the West's Trojan horsemen
/ women - i.e. the ultra-Left
ideologues, who demonstrably hate their own civilisation as much as
any
anti- western terrorist, it may be said that there is a great difference
between the greater or lesser immoralities we are all susceptible to,
and cravenly lending
oneself as blind instruments of social destruction.
There is no doubt that along with the all the wilfully ignored benefits
that Western civilisation has brought to the world, it has made mistakes.
But anyone
who cares to objectively consider modern Western history will discover
that such
mistakes, in both domestic and foreign policy only became truly disastrous,
from
the last half of the 19th century onwards. Again, this was exactly the
time
period during which the aforementioned Marxist type dialectical materialism,
( a complete
corruption and reversal of Hegal ), gained the ascendancy in Western
consciousness. Before the mid 19th century the West's mistakes while
serious, nevertheless
retained something human about them - something all too human it might
be said. But after that time one senses something decidedly inhuman
casting its
shadow over European affairs. Becoming aware of such things is the first
step
towards their conquest and resolution.
At this point I must make it crystal clear that personally I would
welcome large numbers of good non-white people into all western countries,
including New
Zealand, before I would accept one more Left-wing, "liberal",
"white"
European. However, due to the social death wish of moral relativism
, also
bestowed upon us by Left-wing ideology, I now find myself in the bizarre
position of
being obliged to point out that I mean "good" in precisely
the traditional, Western
Christian sense.
With this, and having unambiguously clarified my position upon both
this
point, and humanity's urgent need for true femininity, it is clear that
those
who would condemn these observations as "racist" or "sexist"
are completely foiled.
Their arguments - with which I am wearily familiar - are wrecked.
Having come this far in my ruminations, and having shown that it is
those
Europeans who have succumbed to deviously disseminated Marxist-type
atheistic humanism who are principally responsible for the present world
crisis, I
have thus convinced myself that nothing would be gained under present
circumstances by a miraculous population increase among Europeans.
Hence it becomes shatteringly clear that there are no longer a choice
of
ways to rescue the situation. At this point in history there are not
even two
ways - there is only one.
By sheer, self generated integrity - by dragging themselves up by their
own
bootlaces, a sufficient number of Westerners, or anyone else for that
matter, must restore the true spirit of Western Christian culture to
its proper
sovereignty at this particular period of history, and thus swing the
balance of world
culture back towards sanity and salvation. Failing such a moral renaissance,
any hope of social renewal must lie
somewhere in a distant and indefinite future.
1 The Treaty of Waitangi, 1840, between the
settler government and most
of the Maori people. Now corrupted beyond recognition.
2 London School of Economics - founded in 1884
by the International Fabian
Socialist Society
