New Zealand Equality Education Foundation

(incorporating the International Ex-Fetus Association)

Armageddon for the Radical Feminists (Unedited)

by George Rolph (2003)

 

Home Page
alt.mens-rights FAQ
1000 links
Articles about Issues
Quotations
Male-Friendly Lawyers, Psychologists & Paralegals
Email us !
Sex, Lies & Feminism
Site-map

Many years ago I was reading a book about ancient tribal warfare. It was so long ago I no longer even remember the title of the book. However, one passage was so vivid that it has stuck in my mind until this day.

The passage described what happened to women during and after those tribal wars. During the battle the women would remain close the battlefield with the supply train. There they would watch the fight from some distance away and hope for victory. If their side won the battle they would flood onto the field and mutilate the corpses of their enemies. This mutilation involved removing the fallen men's penises, ears, noses and sometimes, even heads. These “trophies” would then be used to decorate their homes to prove the bravery and skill of their warrior husbands. If their husbands fell in battle the women would often mutilate themselves. If however, their side lost the battle, the women would huddle together in a group wailing and looking as weak as possible in order to try and gain the sympathy of their foes. If they succeeded they would be taken captive and integrated into the tribe of the victorious warriors. If any woman showed aggression to their foe they would not only be killed, but their bodies would be mutilated by the victorious women on the other side. Echoes of this behaviour can be found in the Old Testament.

As I read this account I was struck by the similarities of women today, in the modern world. Though women no longer follow their men to the battle field because modern wars are fought with fast moving machines and they could not keep up: They also no longer go into the field to physically mutilate the oppositions fallen warriors: They have retained, in some deeply ingrained way, elements of that ancient behaviour. It is certainly true that women still display the opposing passive/aggressive behaviour of their ancient cousins.

Like most of us women have a healthy fear of authority. However, 40 years of radical feminist propaganda has taught them to despise individual men. Therefore, while a woman can be a vicious, emotionally violent and physically mutilating (remember Lorena Bobbit) harridan in the home, the moment the blue flashing lights and sirens of a police car appear, her fear of authority can turn her into a huddling, wailing mass of passive victim-hood. Those lights and sirens are to her what the whoops and battle cries of a victorious enemy were to her ancestors. The incoming police officers see, not the mutilating fierce and dangerous person wielding a knife and screaming hatred, but the passive, weeping, cowering, waif. Then they look up and see the man. The symbolic warrior. Tall, strong and with a deep voice. That is often when they slap the handcuffs on the victim and lead him away. Any onlooking kids learn a confusing message. “So. Mummy is the warrior and daddy is the wimp.” Disrespect for father is sown deeply into them at that moment and can remain with them all their lives. However, that disrespect has no real basis in fact. At any time daddy could probably have decked mummy with one punch. Possibly a couple of the cops too. The respect should lie in the fact that he did not. So why don't more men lash out than the domestic violence figures suggest?

The ancient warrior expressed his bravery by risking death on the battle field and by hunting wild animals for food and skins. Both the hunter and the warrior were deeply respected tribal members. It was not a negative fear of these men that kept their women in line, but a genuine awe of their fighting and/or hunting ability. Women also had a social stake in keeping hubby sweet in those times. No hubby, no food. No hubby, no warm furs. No hubby, no help when the enemy came. Each sex had clearly defined roles and domestic and tribal harmony was the result. So what has changed?

In today's western society all women have been taught by some women that the men they used to love are now disposable. If a woman wants clothes, food, shelter and protection today all she has to do is get a job, go shopping, pay her taxes and if she needs help, call the police. It would seem to be ideal and liberating. The need to remain with one partner and encourage him to be brave and strong has been removed. Women no longer seem to need men around them for years at a time. This new view of life within her tribe is breaking down the old social fabric and confusion and hatred is beginning to replace social harmony. The men around her seem weak, fallen and broken. Women are starting to rush onto the battle field to mutilate the dead and dying with false allegations of everything from sexual harassment charges, false domestic violence claims and untrue rape allegations. They are looting the marital homes in outrageous divorce settlements and whooping with joy as they do it. I remember the joy and look of self satisfied victory on the face of Nicole Kidman when she won a huge amount against Tom Cruise in their very public divorce. She left the court and in front of the cameras of the world wide television media, punched the air in vindictive triumph. She had disposed of her man and looted his fortune. It must have seemed that girl power was unstoppable. The myth of female power over men is growing ever stronger but it is a dangerous myth. A myth that may well be the undoing of the female race and set them back hundreds of years.

The modern man seems to have lost his role as hunter and protector. He seems confused and angry. Other men, like the cops who arrest him when she attacks, seem to be enemies also. They are enemies he cannot fight because laws and customs prevent it. Yet deep in his heart he knows this is only a temporary state of affairs. The chaos that is destroying family life at this time will also be the cause of its eventual restitution. Nature not only abhors a vacuum, it also abhors chaos. Mankind naturally spends it's days travelling through time bringing order out of chaos. This tendency is what makes a male backlash inevitable. Indeed, it has already begun. As literally tens of thousands of men fall in the battlefields of the divorce courts, whooping women grapple around their bodies looking for loot. So popular has this disgusting spectacle become among women that they now constitute 70% of divorce filers. But the men they rob are not dead. The same civilising force that prevents daddy from smacking mummy in the mouth when she attacks him also prevents her from killing him when she strips him of his treasures. When she leaves the battlefield to return to the children and teach them to hate her ex and their daddy, he struggles to his feet angrier but also wiser. As more and more men fall under these attacks, more and more of them are soldiers, policemen, judges, politicians, actors, boxers, builders and on and on. Every one of them has something in common with the other. Each has been symbolically raped by a female. Some of them more than once. Each has felt the sting of shame. Each has suffered the humiliation of defeat. Each has battled the silent rage. Each has plotted to find a way of taking back his rightful place in the family. Now. Right now. Today! These men are getting organised.

The civilising process that lead men to this position also taught them that they must not criticise women. Men know that women hate any kind of criticism. As it is a powerful instinct in men to protect females and criticism produces anger in women (anger in women is interpreted by society as fear) men have shied away from fighting back. However, survival is a yet more powerful instinct. It was survival above everything else that led those ancient warriors to take to the field of battle to fight their enemies. To survive against an enemy that seems to have superior numbers men have always buried differences to band together to fight. That banding together has already begun. Warlike noises are coming from the men's camp and you can almost hear the sharpening of weapons in preparation for the fight. Differences are being buried or ironed out and all but the most terrified of men are preparing for battle. As they overcome their reticence of frightening females they will come roaring over the hill.

An estimated two million men world wide now belong to various men's groups. Their numbers are growing daily and their anger is growing in proportion to their numbers. The focus of their rage are the radical feminists that poisoned the minds of their women folk. They see them as sneaky, lying vermin, infesting the tribal hunting grounds and they want them destroyed along with all who supported them.

Wise women in other tribal groups can also see the battle looming ahead. The stupid and the foolish, the arrogant and the greedy women cannot see what is soon to descend on them.

Only three things are certain about the coming battle: Men will win it and the family will be restored. Out of it may grow a new society. Hopefully a better one. One certainty remains: Radical feminism is breathing it's few remaining breaths. The men are coming and they are crying out:-

NO MORE SILENCE!

George Rolph
Man2Man
Soon to be renamed as No-More-silence.

 

Home FAQ Links Issues Quotes Lawyers Email us ! Book SiteMap

Last Update: 7 December 2008

Top