Standard Vs Finescale 9mm gauge track

Code 80 and Code 55 compared.

Peco Streamline 9mm gauge track Compared.
Peco Streamline 9mm gauge track Compared.
9mm`N`gauge track is manufactured by Peco using Nickel-Silver rails and plastic moulded sleepers and is available in different Types or `Codes'. The most popular being Code 80 which is widely available and Code 55 which is often wrongly referred to as N gauge `Finescale' track. There is true fine scale N trackage available in Kit form that you build yourself from the seperate sleepers, chairs & rails but this is not yet available in prefabricated lengths. The track compared here is Streamline `Flexi-track' Code 80 and Code 55. both in Unpainted state. Both types are visually improved greatly by painting the sides of the rails, this gives an even finer `closer to scale' appearance to trackwork with only the top and inner running faces of the rails being `shiny'. Code 80 benefits greatly from painting and can be made to look quite good but In my oppinion using painted Code 55 trackwork vastly improves the overall look of a layout, especially with the inclusion of complex trackwork such as Double Slips in your layout which were and still are widely utilised in railway companies trackplans in the UK.

Specifications.

These are the measurements I have taken myself of pieces of spare Peco streamline track that happened to be laying around in the workshop.

Code 80 dimentions. Code 55 dimentions.

Points, Crossings and `Catch Points'.

There are several items of trackwork that are only available in Code 55, EG; Single Slip, Double Slip, and the Complete Scissors Crossing, are made in Code 55 only. Catch Points are only available in Code 80, but I have heard whispers that catch points will be added to PECO's Code 55 track range. Let's hope it happens soon!

Most if not all of the currently available British, European, American and Japanese N gauge models will run on Code 55 track without any modifications. I have been informed that some old models may have wheel flanges that are too big for Code 55 rail but I have not found any yet myself.

I will be using up the Code 80 track & pointwork I have on my Stoneybridge West layout. I am now also modelling in 2mm finescale (9.24mm track gauge) which uses code 40 rail, the track is built by hand with the aid of templates and roller gauges, or in my case with the aid of a digital vernier.

Joining Code 55 & Code 80 track.

Joining Code 55 & Code 80.

Joining code 55 to Code 80 can be done easily when no electrical connection is required across the join. By packing the Code 55 track up to the level of the Code 80 (using plasticard packing Under the Code 55 track sleepers) you can avoid having to file the Code 80 track down at the ends to lower it to the level of the Code 55 track. If an electrical connection across the join is required in a Scenic section I use a seperate power feed to each individual section of track, Where the join is not in a visible scenic section (The fiddle yard and hidden sidings) I would simply solder a fine piece of wire to the outside of the rails across the track gap.

Painted track, for even better appearance.

Painting Code 55 for better realism.

Painting trackwork can seem a daunting task when first attemting to make realistic model railways (As Opposed to a shiny `trainset') but it is well worth the effort making the track `fit in' better with scenic surroundings and greatly improving the overall look of your layout.

Track Ballasting.

I have used fine crushed granite ballast for all of the trackwork on Stoneybridge and Stoneybridge West as I have a few kilos of it to use up. Using a `HARD' ballast is quite easy with code 55 track as long as care is taken not to clog up pointwork and the inner railchairs are kept clear as even a few stray grains can stop a point blade from closing properly or lift the trains wheels off the track losing electrical contact or worse, it can cause a derailment which can damage fine detailing on locos and stock. (I found that N gauge fine ballast looked really good on my OO Helensburgh Branch) I will be trying out a `soft' ballast for future tracklaying projects as I have now seen several layouts using it with good results. I would reccommend using a soft ballast with code 55 trackwork as there is so little clearance that one single grain of hard ballast can easily cause trouble. Taking precautions like brushing the track and using a hoover to collect the bits are always a good idea when hard ballast is used. Trains being propelled are more likely to be derailed by stray ballast, gaps or mismatched rails than hauled trains, this can be avoided by carefull laying of the ballast. It is tempting to get large areas ballasted in a hurry but I have found that a rushed job usually takes longer to clean up when dry and often needs reworking sooner rather than later. A little care & a little more time spent getting the ballasting right saves time later.

When ballasting sidings, branch lines or some modern day mainlines the addition of a few plants and small bushes to the edges of ballast helps to blend the track into its surroundings. A nice overgrown effect can be produced by adding a light sprinking of scenic scatter material when the ballast is still wet. I use a mixture of shades of green scatter over the ballasted track while it is still wet, I blow gently down a piece of tube to carefully move the greenery around on the ballast helping to spread it into the gaps between ballast and into the glue. A pinch of ballast sprinkled on top will enhance the effect that the plants are growing from between the stones not on top of them, this is most noticeable on larger scales but does make a visible difference in 2mm scale, You do have to look pretty close though.

click here to return to the main index page.

Click here to write and post an email to Ozz Scott

Copyright Notes

All content and graphic images on this page are Copyright ©Ozz Scott 2001, unless otherwise stated.