


|

Saturday, September 14, 2002
More thoughts on "Forbidden Thoughts" I'm not yet through with this topic. I noticed that the editors of Salon printed more of these quotes. When Salon referred to them as "forbidden thoughts," to whom were they referring? In other words, why were those thoughts considered "forbidden?" Last time I recall, it was a free country, and under the First Amendment, freedom of speech and political expression are protected under the United States Constitution. Apparently, Canadian bloggers, who live in near socialism, are unaware of that small technicality.
Anyway, what makes a thought or expression "forbidden?" Unfortunately, the only type of expression that can be considered illegal in this country is one that can cause harm to others. Even many forms of hate speech and pornography are legal in this country. At the time I graduated from J-school, flag burning and cross burning were still legal in this country. As were racist Klan rallies - as long as they were peaceful. As repugnant as these types of speech may be, they are still legal in this country - which is one of the things that makes this country great - the fact that we can speak out against our government should we decide to do so.
Yet the quotes in these Salon piece were labeled "forbidden." Some of the links around the blogosphere about this story used words such as "tripe," "trash," "drivel," "disgusting," "obscene," "spume," "repulsive," "filth," just to name a few. Yet why are these thoughts so forbidden? Some of these statements may not have been appropriate given the consequences, however, much of what was said was part of everyday life. The Salon article is one of the best articles I have read about what people were REALLY thinking on that day - the raw thoughts of average Americans, who didn't have the cameras trained on them 24/7 - and what happened in the aftermath. I got this inspiration to write today's essay not from reading the updated Salon article, but by reading the overkill dedicated to 9-11 in the blogosphere. I kept my computer off for the majority of the day, as well as the TV, but there were far too many syrupy patriotic quotes out there.
While I'm crashing someone's 9-11 party, I guess I'll tack on the essay I was going write today. It's regarding the fashion trend following 9-11. The president called for display of the colors, and there was a rush to wear the colors in any form possible. Unfortunately, people tended to overdo it. Considering that this was supposed to be a solemn occasion, these same people saw nothing wrong with being tacky about displaying the colors in any form possible. Which, of course, is against the law, as outlined in 36 U.S.C. 176 (d): "The flag should never be used as wearing apparel, bedding, or drapery." So, all those t-shirts, earrings, and headbands that purported to be displays of national pride were actually violations of the U.S. Code. Not to mention the poor care that the people that flew the flags in droves heaped on their newfound patriotic symbol. From 36 U.S.C. 176 (b): "The flag should never touch anything beneath it, such as the ground, the floor, water, or merchandise." From 36 U.S.C. 176 (e): "The flag should never be fastened, displayed, used, or stored in such a manner as to permit it to be easily torn, soiled, or damaged in any way." However here's my favorite one. Fortune 500 companies are most to blame for violating this one: It's from 36 U.S.C. 176 (i): "The flag should never be used for advertising purposes in any manner whatsoever." Every media outlet in the country is guilty of this one, as they have their little flag in the corner of the screen with the network name superimposed.
So while people are getting on the case of an online publication such as Salon for having the cojones to air the words of those who dared to voice an alternative view, showing the world that we really do live in a society that enjoys freedom of expression, even under the worst times of duress, it is still disturbing to know that those who control the media, the government, and the mainstream mindset are not even aware of the laws of this country - or simply choose not to follow them.
posted by Brian 12:52 PM
Friday, September 13, 2002
"Forbidden Thoughts" not a hit with everyone It appears that Damian Penny is outraged over Salon's article "Forbidden Thoughts About 9-11", which we linked to here in the Babble yesterday. I have but one question for you, Damian? Where do you get off being the judge on what is tasteful, and what is not? I actually thought the article was a sigh of relief. People actually said what they wanted to say after being repressed from saying it because of all the stigma attached to it being "THE DAY."
Apparently it's not just you in the blogosphere. There's a holier-than-thou attitude associated with this day, and no such blasphemy will be spoken in conjunction with it. I say poppycock! Not all of us were in the thick of the action, and were helpless as we sat in our homes and offices thousands of miles away. It was a day that we went on with our daily lives. It was Tuesday, for crying out loud. And for millions of Americans, as well as millions of New Yorkers, that was just another work day. The President of the United States orders us to go about our daily lives. We do so. You get pissed off. It is for people such as yourselves that articles like this get written.
posted by Brian 11:33 PM
Don't come here looking for a free education More politicians should start thinking this way.
Morris, who beat board Chairman Sonny Rundell in the August primary and faces no Democrat in November, maintains that children of undocumented immigrants should be barred from public schools. That view is contrary to federal law, and it infuriates Hispanic groups, which have started a petition drive against her.
Why let them in to begin with? They should be deported, along with their parents, unless there are outstanding circumstances. It's not a racist policy, it's a matter of national security.
posted by Brian 9:33 AM
Thursday, September 12, 2002
If the terrorists attack Arizona this time, Tucson will be safe. Why? Because, like Vice President Cheney, Tucson Mayor Bob Walkup was kept in a secret location for the past 24 hours.
Tucson Police Department Assistant Chief Kermit Miller said the department knew of no threat against the mayor or the city, but defended the move as a necessary precaution. "He's the city's chief executive," Miller said, adding, "Look at how important a role (New York Mayor Rudolph) Gulianni played in New York City." After the attack on the World Trade Center, Miller noted that Gulianni assumed a highly visible leadership role in the city, doing much to assist rescue efforts and maintain calm in New York.
One problem. TUCSON isn't quite high on the short list of terrorist targets, in my opinion. But I don't pay taxes down there, or I'd be calling for some people to be removed - and NOW.
posted by Brian 9:23 PM
People after my own heart I said the other day that I thought that I wasn't the only one feeling "9-11 malaise." Turns out I was right. Even some people living in New York are tired of it, and have worse sentiments toward the whole thing than I did.
posted by Brian 9:12 PM
It's all in the numbers This is simply bizarre.
On Wednesday, Sept. 11 -- a day that forever will be solemnized by the numbers 9/11 -- the New York State Lottery's Numbers game winner was 9-1-1.
posted by Brian 1:10 PM
Wednesday, September 11, 2002
Neither rain, nor snow, nor threat of deportation... Seems like smugglers will go to any extreme to sneak illegal aliens into this country. Including disguising a van as a U.S. Postal Service vehicle. Naturally, I have a few questions after reading this article.
The Border Patrol arrived on the scene and agents were able to capture 17 men and women, all of whom voluntarily returned to Mexico, he said. The driver of the truck and a few others were not apprehended, Martinez added.
Of course the illegals went back to Mexico! Maybe next time they should spend some time in federal prison first. And why the hell did they let the driver get away?
This isn't the first time smugglers have tried to disguise their transportation as a commercial or government vehicle. Within the last year, police have stopped a fake FedEx truck, and recently a Border Patrol agent spotted a fake construction vehicle.
In other words, the smugglers made the cops look stupid. Or the cops knew about it, but turned the other way. Which is it?
Martinez said the agency was called recently about what appeared to be a postal truck loading up illegal immigrants in a desolate area along the border. He suspects the one involved Monday was the same truck.
This is the one that bothers me. Why didn't they impound the damn thing Monday, unless no arrests were made?
posted by Brian 11:05 PM
Tuesday, September 10, 2002
The war on drugs isn't working - trust me, Mr. President, I mean Uncle George A member of the Bush family is in trouble again. This time, it's the president's niece, Noelle, who was found with cocaine in an Orlando drug rehabilatation center.
Bush was not arrested because police could not obtain sworn statements signed by the center's staff. A worker who found the suspected cocaine on Noelle Bush tore up a sworn statement she had written at the suggestion of one of her bosses, police said.
Could that boss have been appointed by Noelle's father, Gov. Jeb Bush?
posted by Brian 2:39 PM
Monday, September 09, 2002
Looks like someone isn't getting the clue I've never been a big fan of rap/hip-hop music. In fact, I always thought it was a bit amusing to watch the videos, and that some of the performers were extremely talented, but misdirected. However, this whole thing with the late Tupac Shakur and the Notorious B.I.G has me baffled. They have been dead, tragically, for years. However, people can't seem to shut up about it. Did they ever realize how Tupac and B.I.G. ended up that way to begin with?
posted by Brian 1:21 PM
If we let them in, will they burn the whole country down? The Arizona Daily Star says eight major wildfires this year in southern Arizona were linked to illegal immigration.
Food containers, juice cans and water bottles from Mexico were found at many of the fires' starting points. The Star reports that nearly all were along popular immigrant smuggling routes rarely used by others. In some cases, the fires were traced back to campfires.
The Star says the tab for fighting the fires exceeded $5 million.
Another example of how NOT ENFORCING THE LAW is costing taxpayer dollars, as these wildfires were mainly on federal lands.
posted by Brian 1:11 PM
Sunday, September 08, 2002
Now I know why I left New York It's a good thing Jeff Jarvis doesn't allow comments, or I'd leave a long one about his most recent post. It seems he takes offense to the fact that many of us on the West Coast do not share the same feelings for September 11 as those on the East Coast. No kidding, Dick Tracy. It's not that we're not a bunch of selfish, unfeeling people out here, as Jeff seems to think. It's just that it didn't happen here. If Osama and his boys crashed into downtown Los Angeles, which might have been a blessing in disguise, the sentiment would have similar on the West Coast.
However, Jeff, I have a question for you. Where were you in 1992 when L.A. burned? I bet you don't even know what the hell I'm talking about. That's because contrary to what you say, New Yorkers are far more selfish than Angelenos. I've lived in both cities, and New York may loosen up after recovering from this tragedy, but it will return to business as usual. By the way, 1992 was the year of the L.A. riots.
posted by Brian 5:33 PM
4000 Hits! Sometime last night, visitor number 4000 arrived at my site. I know some blogs get that in a day, but it's a Big Deal for me. Who knows, it was probably my mom or something padding my stats. Since I'm hosted at FortuneCity, I don't have the benefit of referrer logs so I can find out where that hit came from - and pay them a visit.
posted by Brian 4:16 PM
|
 |
The Daily Babble

Still looking for that Instapundit link.
|
|