Real
Ear and Artificial Mastoid Bone Conduction Calibration
Loudness
Balance Technique (Beranek 1949)
Bone
and air conducted stimuli are alternated in presentation.
The listener is required to adjust the magnitude of
one stimulus until it is perceived as equally loud as the
other. When
averaged over a number of individuals, an approximate
calibration of the bone conductor can be determined at
each test frequency (Barry et al, 1981; Hedgecock, 1961).
Real Ear Procedures
This
method assumes that air and bone conduction thresholds are
equivalent for the test subject.
If many subjects (6 or more) are testing by air and
bone conduction using an audiometer that is properly
calibrated for air conduction, corrections for bone
conduction can be applied by finding the difference
between the two methods of testing.
The underlying principle here is that BC thresholds
should be equal to AC thresholds in the absence of a
conductive impairment (Hood, 1979).
Although this is true for a large population of
subjects, it cannot be expected to be true for any
individual or for very small groups (Studebaker, 1967;
Wilber et al, 1967).
Roach
and Carhart (1956) suggest using subjects with a purely
sensorineural hearing loss to avoid difficulties
associated with ambient nose in the clinical setting, as
well as lack of audiometric sensitivity, thus increasing
the probability of obtaining true thresholds.
Subjective Phase
Cancellation
In this
method, simultaneous air and bone conducted signals are
presented to the subject.
The theory behind this procedure is that the
subject could adjust the phase and magnitude of the
stimulus of one signal (either air or bone) in such a way
as to achieve cancellation of the other stimulus, thus
resulting in no signal being heard.
When this state is reached, an auditory null is said
to be achieved whereby the BC stimulus is equal in
magnitude to the AC tone (at the cochlea) (Dempsey et al.
1990; Kapteyn, Boeze, & Snel, 1983; Kapteyn, Snel,
& Vis, 1980; Levitt, 1987).
Once this is achieved, a calibration for the bone
conductor can be determined at this frequency.
Artificial Mastoid
Procedure
The most common and clinically
preferred procedure for
calibrating the bone vibrator is one involving an
artificial mastoid. In the past, no commercially
available artificial mastoid met the mechanical impedance
requirements of the ANSI (S3.13-1972), or IEC (IEC
373-1971) standards. Because of this, these
standards were revised to conform to the specification of
an artificial mastoid that was available. The new
standard was ANSI S3.13-1987. Audiologists may find
it interesting to know that the International Standards
Organization (ISO) has developed a draft standard for bone
conduction thresholds (ISO / DIS 7566 -1987) that gives
one set of values that are to be used for all
bone-vibrators having the circular tip described in the
ANSI and IEC standards. Both the ANSI and ISO values
are based on unoccluded ears using contralateral
masking. Studies have shown (Shipton et al. 1980)
that air borne radiation from the bone vibrator can affect
measurement variability when testing under an unoccluded
ear. For further information regarding the
implications of using an unoccluded ear please see the air-borne
radiation article.
The recommended RMS force values (in
dB re 1 uN) for 0 dB HL for the Radioear B-71 bone
vibrator is as follows:
|
Frequency (Hz) |
ANSI S3.43-1992 |
ISO 7566-1987 |
| 250 |
67.0 |
67.0 |
| 500 |
58.0 |
58.0 |
| 1000 |
42.5 |
42.5 |
| 2000 |
31.0 |
31.0 |
| 3000 |
30.0 |
30.0 |
| 4000 |
35.5 |
35.5 |
To take a look at a sample bone
conduction calibration worksheet, click
here
When calibrating the bone vibrator,
it is necessary to remove the vibratory mechanism from the
head band before placing it onto the artificial
mastoid. Below is a diagram of the equipment set up
for a bone vibrator calibration.

Note: This site is
best viewed using IE 4.X or higher under 800x600
resolution
|