Bone
conduction thresholds poorer than air
In an
article by Barry (1994), he addresses the issue of whether
bone conduction thresholds can be poorer than air
conduction, and if so, is it alright to record BC
thresholds at the AC threshold.
Audiologists
are taught that BC test results cannot be lower than AC
thresholds. AC measures the sensitivity of the entire hearing mechanism
while BC measures only a part of that mechanism. The logic
here stems from the fact that a loss in part of the system
cannot exceed the loss in the entire system, hence BC can
not be poorer than AC.
Although what we have been taught does make sense,
Audiologists need to know that it may not always hold
true.
According
to Barry (1994), the reasoning above fails to consider
both the ossicular and meatal contributions to BC
sensitivity, and it fails to take into account the
significant differences which exist within and across
individuals in the efficiency of signals transmission
through the AC and BC pathways.
Barry (1994) then goes to argue that AC and BC
reference thresholds as indicated in standards, represent
average values with a normal sampling distribution
(otherwise known as a bell curve).
Most people therefore will have their results fall
under average values where AC and BC will be clinically
agreeable. It
is possible that both AC and BC results can fall on either
extreme of the distribution, thus producing a better or
poorer agreement with average values, but nonetheless
still clinically agreeable.
Average
values:
Purely
as a result of statistics, it is also possible for the AC
thresholds to be on one extreme tail of the normal
distribution while BC thresholds to be on the opposite.
When this happens a apparently false air bone gap
can be found. The
reverse can also occur where BC thresholds fall on the
less sensitive tail of the distribution while AC
thresholds fall on the more sensitive side.
When this happens, BC thresholds can appear to be
poorer than AC. As
stated in ANSI S3.42 – 1992,” exact equivalence of
air- and bone-conduction thresholds cannot be expected.”
Having
said this however, it is highly unlikely that major
differences in AC and BC thresholds can be attributable to
statistical variation by itself. A 5 or 10 dB difference where BC thresholds appear poor than
AC may not be startling, but a 15 dB or more difference is
subject to greater examination.
As
to whether to record the BC threshold at the AC threshold
if BC results appear poor, the answer is simple.
No! Changing
the results to anything other than what was actually
observed can have severe legal repercussions.
In addition, recording the results as they are
observed will give insight into the possible
miscalibration of test equipment over longitudinal
examination of test results.
Note: This site is
best viewed using IE 4.X or higher under 800x600
resolution
|