Variability in
Switching Transducers
A study by Valente et
al (1994) compared two transducers (TDH 39P earphones and
ER-3A insert phones) by looking at their real-ear
SPL performance across a frequency range of 500-4000
Hz. The authors found that the real-ear SPL differed
by 2.4 dB at 1500 Hz to as much as 10.4 dB at 500 Hz
between the two transducers. The SPL generated using
the TDH 39P earphone was significantly great than the real
ear SPL generated by the ER-3A insert phone.
Other
studies have also found output differences between the two
styles of transducers. A study by Frank and Vavrek
(1992) found that when the output of the TDH-49 and the
ER-3A were measured in a coupler, the following difference
were observed.
| Frequency
Hz |
500 |
1000 |
2000 |
3000 |
4000 |
| Difference
in dB |
5.9 |
4.0 |
6.6 |
5.1 |
4.1 |
The TDH 49 was measured
in a NBS-9A coupler and the ER-3A in a HA-2
coupler.
The significant
difference in measured SPL between the two transducers
points out the effect that transducer type can have on
real ear measured SPL. From this problem, one can
deduce the potential problem of switching transducers from
different audiometers for which the transducer was not
originally calibrated. Despite this variability
across transducers, switching earphones is a common
practice. According to Lilly and Purdy (1993), doing
this can create significant differences between the input
impedance of the ER-3A insert phone and the specified
load impedance of the output to the audiometer.
Audiologists should be
aware that the ER-3A insert phones come in different
impedance values (10, 50, 300 ohms). In the Valente
et al (1994) study, an insert phone of 10 ohms was
calibrated for an audiometer rated for 10 ohm
transducers. A 50 ohm TDH style earphone can also be
used on this audiometer, but a 6 dB average increase in
output measurements can be expected compared to the 10 ohm
device. Audiologists need to apply a correction
factor to account for this increase when switching
transducer among different audiometers.
The above example
outlined how a transducer of greater impedance can be used
for an audiometer rated with lower impedance. The
reverse is not true. That is, it is not recommended
that transducers of 10 ohms be used for audiometers rated
for 50 ohms. Doing so can lead to excessive
distortion and damage to the audiometer.
The following table
from Valente et al. (1994) further illustrates the problem
of switching transducers among different
audiometers.
The ER-3A insert phones
were calibrated for audiometer A (see below). ANSI (1989)
standards are listed on the top of table 2. As you
can see, the output values from audiometer A are all
within 3 dB of the ANSI (1989) standard. Great
amount of variability existed at audiometer B-C relative
to A and to the standard.

Taken
from Valente et al 1994
The
critical point to note here is that when the same ER-3A
insert phone is used on different audiometers, it is
possible to obtain different SPLs measured in the ear
canal when the attenuator is fixed at a predetermined
level.
Note: This site is
best viewed using IE 4.X or higher under 800x600
resolution
|