Frequently
Asked Questions
On January 30, 2002, an
international reader from the UK wrote,
Hello
I like the audiomtric pages, very good. Do you know, have
access to information,specification/suppliers on the
various couplers especially those used in the States. I am
familiar with the various IEC couplers (60318 parts 1,2
& 3, 60126, 60711 & 60373) but have little
information on the 9A coupler and nothing on some of the
other devices that you mention (HA1, HA2 etc)
Regards
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Der wrote,
Thanks for your question. The 9A
and HA1 HA2 couplers that you mentioned are used
specifically for the calibration of audiometric equipment.
The NBS 9A (there is a diagram on the topic
titled Audiometric Earphone Calibration Using and
Artificial Ear/Reference Coupler in the Audiometer
section) is commonly used for calibrating the TDH
style earphones for use with a clinical audiometer.
Theoretically it is supposed to mimic an average
(artificial) ear's volume with the earphone cup placed
over it. The HA1 and HA2 couplers are 2cc couplers commonly
used to calibrate the ER3A type insert earphones. I
will try to find you additional information on these
couplers and their suppliers and I will post it on my
website and email it to you.
Regards,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reader responded,
Thanks, am looking at writting a
history of ear simulators that I will put on our web
pages, it just started with the reference coupler,
artificial ear and mechainical coupler as part of an
introduction for a guide for BSI/IEC and has sort of
grown. In the UK/Europe the two couplers used for pure
tone air conduction calibration of supra-aurals are the
IEC reference coupler was IEC 303 now IEC 60318-3 and the
artificial ear was IEC 318 now IEC 60318-1 (its nice to
add a bit of confusion!).
I thought that the 9A coupler was
similar (slightly different volume) to the IEC reference
coupler, can you confirm that ANSI allows calibration of
TDH49 etc on this device. Under ISO/IEC standards ISO
389-1 states that the reference coupler should only be
used with Beyer DT48 earphones with flat cushions and with
Telephonics TDH-39 earphones fitted either with MX 41/AR
cushions or with the newer style one-piece Model 51 (P/N
510C017-1) cushions, when the RETSPLs given in Table 1
should be used. Hence the artificial ear and RETSPLs given
in ISO 389-1Table 2 should be used for any other
combination. This implied statement of equivalence between
MX 41/AR and Model 51 cushions was included for the first
time in this recent issue of ISO 389-1. Until then it had
been implied that TDH-39 earphones fitted with Model 51
cushions should use the artificial ear as the calibration
device, together with the RETSPLs for that device. This
posed many calibration problems and ISO decided to clarify
any ambiguity by defining the cushions as equivalent.
Metal and plastic cased telephonics earphones are also
considered similar (but I disagree but thats another
story)
I see you reference the grid on/grid
off work I did more years ago than I care to mention, does
the 9A coupler specify LS1P microphone or can it be used
with grid on, is it used with grid on. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Der's replied:
Regarding your question on whether
ANSI allows calibration on an IEC 318 coupler.
I can confirm that ANSI allows that TDH39/49/50 earphones
to be calibrated using an IEC 318 coupler (refer to Annex
A: Correction figrues for free-field equivalent
output for certain types of commonly used earphones, ANSI
S3.6 -1996). Correction values are however different
for both the IEC 318 and ANSI 9A coupler, so although
ANSI does allow for calibration using the IEC 318, a
different set of correction values need to be applied to
the measured data of SPL.
Regarding your comment on the
equivalence of the MX 41/AR and the model 51 cushion.
I believe that ANSI has considered them to be equivalent
for some time. Have you found that the calibration
on the same earphone using a different cushion has lead to
some measurement variability?
Hope this was helpful. If I
can offer further assistance, please don't hesitate to
ask.
Regards
Michael Der
Note: This site is
best viewed using IE 4.X or higher under 800x600
resolution
|