|
|
|
UNMASKING NASA EXAMPLES OF THE REAL LUNAR LANDSCAPE AS NASA CENSORS AND EDITS. |
This is official NASA pic #10074968 This appears like all the 'lunar landscape' photographs - to show a barren airless sunlit landscape. NASA has worked hard in ensuring that this perception is the only possible one for millions of humans. But it's a lie. Let me show you how NASA has fooled you. |
|
Firstly. It's a negative. This is the correct way to see this photograph. As I'll show, it's been layered over with a fake surface texture, to give a uniform 'grey' color. And as I'll prove, all that 'white' material (dark in the supposed 'original' photograph) is fake and has been layered over the landscape. |
|
The multiple layering in the photograph becomes visible when we unmask a section. Note the obvious false light source that almost appears to 'glow' through the photograph - and which is clearly artificial. |
|
Lets go closely in on the 'island' or outcrop of rock. Remember, if this is now a real negative, that we're looking at - it should be glaringly obvious. |
|
We unmask segments on the rock - revealing layered tubelike objects. Note again how the light areas of the rock are a totally different 'white' texture to the fake background. |
|
Here's the lower half of the photograph unmasked. Notice again the real grey texture of the actual landscape, compared to the fake 'white' texture added by NASA when they reversed the photograph during processing. |
|
And if we look closely at the edge of the land and that 'white' texture - we can see both the chaotic detail of the real landscape, although its fuzzy - as well as the multiple layering that NASA have used to obscure the real landscape. (Note how the detail continues 'under' the supposedly empty white texture.
|
And the exact same section of photo as NASA shows in order to make you believe that this is the 'real' landscape:
|
Then if we look at the section at the top of the photo - first as NASA shows it..
 |
Then as it is. Note the shapes, the false edge of the white material compared to the land texture, and the backlight from an artificial photographic light source.
