NASA UNMASKED

UNMASKING NASA

HOW NASA EDITS AND CENSORS DETAIL USING FAKED 'OVER EXPOSED' AND 'DARK' SECTIONS.

Let's move the focus off our nearest neighbour the Moon, and look at an example of NASA image faking - this time from Mars.

This is a combination demo of how NASA hide data in supposedly 'over-exposed' parts of their photographs - as well as showing more examples of massive detail being overlaid with fake 'surface textures'.

This is AB108506

As usual, it's an empty Martian landscape.

Supposedly...

Let's look at a section of the scene - one from the top (in the apparently 'brightly lit' area.)

(The image has been layered on a a map projection format, so images when we go in close, will appear slightly flattened or distorted to a degree, this is normal)

Also, I've saved it in grayscale in order to remove the extra colors and garbage inherent..

This is from the extreme top of the picture, and as you can see - seems over-exposed. Almost unnaturally so..

Yet there also appears to be detail amidst the brightest part of the 'glare' in the center of the photo.

If we do a simple unmask of the centre of the 'glare', we discover this that the actual data on the photograph has been removed. Physically cut out from the photograph

The photograph has then been placed over a lightsource, and re-imaged.

Here's a close view showing the flat blank emptiness which you've been made to think is supposedly just 'empty landscape' reflecting glare.

(There's NO kind of planetary 'photographic effect' that can create that obviously edited and cut-out-and-removed centre-piece.)

So whatever is in this area, has been quietly removed by NASA, who have re-photographed the photo, and added in 'glare' to hide the editing.

If you look below at a larger, darkened view of the photograph top section - the cut-out areas become extremely visible - and you begin to see that the picture is nothing like what it appeared to be at first glance.

The completely clear areas as you can see below, are now noticeable - these are pieces of the original photograph that have been cut out and removed entirely.

But there's more..

Notice this extremely dark 'shadow' running down the picture at left, when the picture is unmasked.

(This is how the same pic looks in the original, with NASA's fake 'white landscape' texture layered over it..)

But the 'dark shadow' itself, as you can see in the unmasked version to the right - when I've increased light through the black masking - shows detail that has been hidden.

But once the masking is on, and the fake glare is added, and whatever 'light' surface texture has been used, all this work remains invisible to the casual eye..

Presumably to hide whatever is visible clustered on the cliff edge..

So we've established that the centre of the photograph at the top of this long satellite strip, has been cut out, and that the cliff-edge to the left, has been drawn on.

Now lets look to the left of that deliberately obscured cliff-edge, which runs down this section of the photograph..

As you can see, when unmasked - large sections have been simply removed, leaving empty space. (Some kind of light source has probably been shone through these empty area's, to cause the 'glare'- which would make most photo researchers or analysts ignore this area of the photograph.

That extremely dark patch to the right of the cut-out section, is the previously pointed out drawn on cliff edge and slope.

Here's the area as it looks on the map. (Ignore the rectangle, that was just imaging software)

Let's take a look at the area to the LEFT of all of this.

Just to show you that reality is not what it seems, and to demonstrate the steps I'm taking - I'm going to remove some of the light in the photograph..